<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Kernel Density Estimation in a confined area in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/kernel-density-estimation-in-a-confined-area/m-p/223244#M707</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm looking at homeranges and using the Geospatial Modelling Environment tool (previously Hawth's tool) to do some KDE work.&amp;nbsp; The population I'm studying lives in a confined area.&amp;nbsp; I'd like to use the shapefile of their habitat to confine the probablility surface.&amp;nbsp; So far I've found I can create the prob surface and then use the habitat shapefile to cut them out (method 1).&amp;nbsp; However, this doesn't make sense as there is 0 probability they will be found outside of their habitat.&amp;nbsp; I was wondering if anyone else had tackled this problem or if anyone knows how to use the border to confine the probabililty surface (method 2)?&amp;nbsp; Or indeed if this is the correct method.&amp;nbsp; I've looked at both Arc's KDE and GME's KDE functions but I can't seem to find anything to help.&amp;nbsp; Processing extents or masks tend to cut of the probability surface meaning it replicates method 1. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As always, any help would be appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And Happy Holidays!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OliverBurdekin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-26T08:03:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kernel Density Estimation in a confined area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/kernel-density-estimation-in-a-confined-area/m-p/223244#M707</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm looking at homeranges and using the Geospatial Modelling Environment tool (previously Hawth's tool) to do some KDE work.&amp;nbsp; The population I'm studying lives in a confined area.&amp;nbsp; I'd like to use the shapefile of their habitat to confine the probablility surface.&amp;nbsp; So far I've found I can create the prob surface and then use the habitat shapefile to cut them out (method 1).&amp;nbsp; However, this doesn't make sense as there is 0 probability they will be found outside of their habitat.&amp;nbsp; I was wondering if anyone else had tackled this problem or if anyone knows how to use the border to confine the probabililty surface (method 2)?&amp;nbsp; Or indeed if this is the correct method.&amp;nbsp; I've looked at both Arc's KDE and GME's KDE functions but I can't seem to find anything to help.&amp;nbsp; Processing extents or masks tend to cut of the probability surface meaning it replicates method 1. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As always, any help would be appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And Happy Holidays!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/kernel-density-estimation-in-a-confined-area/m-p/223244#M707</guid>
      <dc:creator>OliverBurdekin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-26T08:03:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

