<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Optimized Hot Spot Analysis and Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation yield different distance band results in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-and-incremental/m-p/169843#M541</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS 10.2 &amp;nbsp;Spatial Statistics Toolbox&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like your ideas with the following issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 64 polygons and analyze unemployment. &lt;STRONG&gt;I want to find the scale of analysis &amp;nbsp;- distance fixed band&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I follow two ways:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A) Use Optimized Hot Spot Analysis (This script uses Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation to define the scale of analysis). The optimal fixed distance band is &lt;STRONG&gt;2979m. &lt;/STRONG&gt;See last line in the snapshot below.&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/242661_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;B) I run Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation tool for the same dataset by myself. The peak is at 3296m (I have removed locational outliers).&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;See last line in the snapshot below.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/242684_pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Why there is &amp;nbsp;this large &amp;nbsp;difference in distance band: &amp;nbsp;2969&amp;nbsp; and 3296.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would expect similar results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea (especially from ESRI engineers) would help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for contributing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;George&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GeorgeGrekousis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-10T15:38:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Optimized Hot Spot Analysis and Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation yield different distance band results</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-and-incremental/m-p/169843#M541</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS 10.2 &amp;nbsp;Spatial Statistics Toolbox&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like your ideas with the following issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 64 polygons and analyze unemployment. &lt;STRONG&gt;I want to find the scale of analysis &amp;nbsp;- distance fixed band&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I follow two ways:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A) Use Optimized Hot Spot Analysis (This script uses Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation to define the scale of analysis). The optimal fixed distance band is &lt;STRONG&gt;2979m. &lt;/STRONG&gt;See last line in the snapshot below.&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/242661_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;B) I run Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation tool for the same dataset by myself. The peak is at 3296m (I have removed locational outliers).&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;See last line in the snapshot below.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/242684_pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Why there is &amp;nbsp;this large &amp;nbsp;difference in distance band: &amp;nbsp;2969&amp;nbsp; and 3296.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would expect similar results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea (especially from ESRI engineers) would help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for contributing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;George&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-and-incremental/m-p/169843#M541</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeorgeGrekousis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-10T15:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

