<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Optimized Hot Spot Analysis - Analysis Field Variation in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-analysis-field/m-p/1359448#M2610</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if anyone might be able to provide insight on how much variation is required in the input field when running an Optimized Hot Spot Analysis? When reviewing ESRI's'&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/3.1/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/how-optimized-hot-spot-analysis-works.htm" target="_self"&gt;How Optimized Hot Spot Analysis works&lt;/A&gt;' documentation, the following information is provided: '&lt;SPAN&gt;The&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Optimized Hot Spot Analysis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;tool will check the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Analysis Field&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;to confirm that the values have at &lt;U&gt;least some variation.&lt;/U&gt;'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For context, I have a dataset for which I would like to run a hot spot analysis to look for statistically significant clustering, and the analysis field is an integer ranging from -3 to +3. When running the Optimized Hot Spot Analysis tool, I don't see any warnings or errors indicating that this level of variation is insufficient; however, I would love to find some additional resources that might address statistical considerations pertaining to variation in the analysis field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexanderSwain</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-11T22:59:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Optimized Hot Spot Analysis - Analysis Field Variation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-analysis-field/m-p/1359448#M2610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if anyone might be able to provide insight on how much variation is required in the input field when running an Optimized Hot Spot Analysis? When reviewing ESRI's'&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/3.1/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/how-optimized-hot-spot-analysis-works.htm" target="_self"&gt;How Optimized Hot Spot Analysis works&lt;/A&gt;' documentation, the following information is provided: '&lt;SPAN&gt;The&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Optimized Hot Spot Analysis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;tool will check the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Analysis Field&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;to confirm that the values have at &lt;U&gt;least some variation.&lt;/U&gt;'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For context, I have a dataset for which I would like to run a hot spot analysis to look for statistically significant clustering, and the analysis field is an integer ranging from -3 to +3. When running the Optimized Hot Spot Analysis tool, I don't see any warnings or errors indicating that this level of variation is insufficient; however, I would love to find some additional resources that might address statistical considerations pertaining to variation in the analysis field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-analysis-field/m-p/1359448#M2610</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexanderSwain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-11T22:59:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimized Hot Spot Analysis - Analysis Field Variation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-analysis-field/m-p/1360728#M2612</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Alexander,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it's pretty neat you're using integer values between -3 and +3 for your values in the analysis field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a divergent field with normal at zero, kind of like cool, cold, freezing on the left side and warm, hot, burning on the right side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Color brewer.png" style="width: 227px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/89273i001272734DDEFDE3/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Color brewer.png" alt="Color brewer.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depending on how you classify it,&amp;nbsp; your data can be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ordinal: the data can be categorized and ranked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interval: the data can be categorized and ranked, and evenly spaced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why don't you run it and see what happens, report back, and enlighten us.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You're still going to need a minimum of 30 samples. I'm hoping you have lots more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I like about "optimized" hot-spot is it adjusts the neighborhood distance so you get meaningful results.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please just don't break the internet, ok?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RSVP - Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06:11:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-analysis-field/m-p/1360728#M2612</guid>
      <dc:creator>RonaldHaug</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-17T06:11:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

