<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Network Spatial Weights Matrix &amp;quot;Inverse&amp;quot; use of weighted values in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/network-spatial-weights-matrix-quot-inverse-quot/m-p/1173117#M2531</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I am new to these spatial weights matrix builds so am probably missing something. I have been using the Build Network Spatial Weights Matrix tool using "&lt;STRONG&gt;Inverse&lt;/STRONG&gt;" for Conceptualization of Spatial Relationships of street light poles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then use a GP tool to convert the matrix to a table, select for a certain sample point + it's neighbors, then join them to the point feature class to visualize the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am seeing mixed results in regard to weights; it appears some neighbors are weighted, and some are not:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_2-1652309916690.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41178i661E69A1E00A1214/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_2-1652309916690.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_2-1652309916690.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Weighted results, neighbors for sample point &lt;STRONG&gt;PL-313356&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_1-1652309787057.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41174iABBFC978940C5700/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_1-1652309787057.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_1-1652309787057.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Weighted results, neighbors for sample point &lt;STRONG&gt;PL-300070&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_3-1652310164013.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41176i5EB16603E73B5FF6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_3-1652310164013.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_3-1652310164013.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Non-weighted result, neighbors for sample point &lt;STRONG&gt;PL-341696&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_0-1652309723915.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41173i86D2A31F3916D633/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_0-1652309723915.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_0-1652309723915.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see results like above when using the "Fixed" version of Conceptualization of Spatial Relationships... any idea why some results appear Fixed and others appear Inverse/weighted when using "&lt;STRONG&gt;Inverse&lt;/STRONG&gt;"? Hope this makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 23:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BrittanyBurson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-11T23:06:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Network Spatial Weights Matrix "Inverse" use of weighted values</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/network-spatial-weights-matrix-quot-inverse-quot/m-p/1173117#M2531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I am new to these spatial weights matrix builds so am probably missing something. I have been using the Build Network Spatial Weights Matrix tool using "&lt;STRONG&gt;Inverse&lt;/STRONG&gt;" for Conceptualization of Spatial Relationships of street light poles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then use a GP tool to convert the matrix to a table, select for a certain sample point + it's neighbors, then join them to the point feature class to visualize the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am seeing mixed results in regard to weights; it appears some neighbors are weighted, and some are not:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_2-1652309916690.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41178i661E69A1E00A1214/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_2-1652309916690.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_2-1652309916690.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Weighted results, neighbors for sample point &lt;STRONG&gt;PL-313356&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_1-1652309787057.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41174iABBFC978940C5700/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_1-1652309787057.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_1-1652309787057.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Weighted results, neighbors for sample point &lt;STRONG&gt;PL-300070&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_3-1652310164013.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41176i5EB16603E73B5FF6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_3-1652310164013.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_3-1652310164013.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Non-weighted result, neighbors for sample point &lt;STRONG&gt;PL-341696&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BrittanyBurson_0-1652309723915.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41173i86D2A31F3916D633/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BrittanyBurson_0-1652309723915.png" alt="BrittanyBurson_0-1652309723915.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see results like above when using the "Fixed" version of Conceptualization of Spatial Relationships... any idea why some results appear Fixed and others appear Inverse/weighted when using "&lt;STRONG&gt;Inverse&lt;/STRONG&gt;"? Hope this makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 23:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/network-spatial-weights-matrix-quot-inverse-quot/m-p/1173117#M2531</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrittanyBurson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-11T23:06:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

