<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Spatial Autocorrelation in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/spatial-autocorrelation/m-p/743228#M2335</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is actually point data.&amp;nbsp; I read each observation in with a lat and long coord.&amp;nbsp; So there is a couple points on top of eachother in each of the 12 locations.&amp;nbsp; There are a total of 255 points.&amp;nbsp; I suppose the hotspot analysis would idenfity clusters if there were any.&amp;nbsp; I will give that a try and see what results suggest.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sarahvoeller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-13T00:41:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spatial Autocorrelation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/spatial-autocorrelation/m-p/743226#M2333</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have samples of individuals from various areas in South and Central America (12 samples, so 12 locations).&amp;nbsp; Each sample has a different number of individuals with a measurement assigned to them.&amp;nbsp; Each sample also has somewhere between 4-40 individuals.&amp;nbsp; So there are coincident data at each location.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to see if there is spatial autocorrelation (clustering/dispersion) among the samples taking into account this measurement.&amp;nbsp; I am using the Spatial Autocorrelation Moran's 1 tool.&amp;nbsp; Having done something similar to this before, I felt each location could only have one value.&amp;nbsp; In the past (using geostatistical analyst), it would just average the values at each location.&amp;nbsp; So I went ahead and did that myself.&amp;nbsp; Thus I had 12 locations, each with one data point.&amp;nbsp; I ran the spatial autocorrelation tool, and there was nothing significant.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing it again without averaging the samples.&amp;nbsp; Thus each location as between 4-40 data points.&amp;nbsp; After running the tool again, it finds significant clustering.&amp;nbsp; However, if there are 12 locations with a ton of data points, I feel this is due to sampleing bias.&amp;nbsp; Is that right?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions on the best way to do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/spatial-autocorrelation/m-p/743226#M2333</guid>
      <dc:creator>sarahvoeller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-12T23:33:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Autocorrelation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/spatial-autocorrelation/m-p/743227#M2334</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;from the help &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/spatial-autocorrelation.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/spatial-autocorrelation.htm"&gt;Spatial Autocorrelation (Global Moran's I)—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/optimized-hot-spot-analysis.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/optimized-hot-spot-analysis.htm"&gt;Optimized Hot Spot Analysis—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop&lt;/A&gt; would be worth looking at as well,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you have multiple people ascribed to a polygon, one does have to consider how applicable the polygon boundaries are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/spatial-autocorrelation/m-p/743227#M2334</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-12T23:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Autocorrelation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/spatial-autocorrelation/m-p/743228#M2335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is actually point data.&amp;nbsp; I read each observation in with a lat and long coord.&amp;nbsp; So there is a couple points on top of eachother in each of the 12 locations.&amp;nbsp; There are a total of 255 points.&amp;nbsp; I suppose the hotspot analysis would idenfity clusters if there were any.&amp;nbsp; I will give that a try and see what results suggest.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/spatial-autocorrelation/m-p/743228#M2335</guid>
      <dc:creator>sarahvoeller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-13T00:41:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

