<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation and Hot Spot Analysis in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/incremental-spatial-autocorrelation-and-hot-spot/m-p/740037#M2326</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I intend to apply a hot spot analysi (Gi*) for which I want to provide the optimal conceptualization of spatial relationship. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To get a hint on what might be the best suitable fixed distance band for my research purpose, I tried the tool Incremental Spatial Autocorrelatation. At that point the problem occurs: the results are just fine in case of proposed distance (z-score peak is around 50 meters which is OK) but the z-score is way too high! If I reduce the spatial extent of the analysis by running the script for a smaller amount of data or in better words, for a part of the data, the z-score decreases to appropriate value ranges (-1 til 3 or 4). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any idea why this happens? Have I missed some detail here?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I attached the graphical result to clarify my problem.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance! Best regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Florian&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; [ATTACH=CONFIG]31175[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FlorianPrummer1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-06T09:27:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Incremental Spatial Autocorrelation and Hot Spot Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/incremental-spatial-autocorrelation-and-hot-spot/m-p/740037#M2326</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I intend to apply a hot spot analysi (Gi*) for which I want to provide the optimal conceptualization of spatial relationship. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To get a hint on what might be the best suitable fixed distance band for my research purpose, I tried the tool Incremental Spatial Autocorrelatation. At that point the problem occurs: the results are just fine in case of proposed distance (z-score peak is around 50 meters which is OK) but the z-score is way too high! If I reduce the spatial extent of the analysis by running the script for a smaller amount of data or in better words, for a part of the data, the z-score decreases to appropriate value ranges (-1 til 3 or 4). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any idea why this happens? Have I missed some detail here?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I attached the graphical result to clarify my problem.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance! Best regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Florian&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; [ATTACH=CONFIG]31175[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/incremental-spatial-autocorrelation-and-hot-spot/m-p/740037#M2326</guid>
      <dc:creator>FlorianPrummer1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-06T09:27:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

