<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic maxlike classification problem in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/maxlike-classification-problem/m-p/703316#M2263</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello, i dont know if someone could help me with this...I am doing a cluster classification using maxlike and isocluster for create the signature field. After the classification i calculate the confusion index by doing the difference between the assignation&amp;nbsp; probability of a pixel to the belonging class and the assignation probability to the second more probable class. This probabilities are calculates using class probability tool.&amp;nbsp; I have estandarized all the variables and i have done two classification at different escales...But i am having problems with classification at a third resolution scale (180m), it is not correct even following the same criterio as i did in the previous classification, since the classification is not logic and when i calculate de confusion index, there are pixels for which the class probaility is lower than that of the second class more probable and that doesn't make sence.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has someone had the same problem using maxlike, obteining wrong classifications using the same criteria than in a previous right classifcation??&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Many thanx&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:43:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paulagarcia_llamas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-16T14:43:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>maxlike classification problem</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/maxlike-classification-problem/m-p/703316#M2263</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello, i dont know if someone could help me with this...I am doing a cluster classification using maxlike and isocluster for create the signature field. After the classification i calculate the confusion index by doing the difference between the assignation&amp;nbsp; probability of a pixel to the belonging class and the assignation probability to the second more probable class. This probabilities are calculates using class probability tool.&amp;nbsp; I have estandarized all the variables and i have done two classification at different escales...But i am having problems with classification at a third resolution scale (180m), it is not correct even following the same criterio as i did in the previous classification, since the classification is not logic and when i calculate de confusion index, there are pixels for which the class probaility is lower than that of the second class more probable and that doesn't make sence.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has someone had the same problem using maxlike, obteining wrong classifications using the same criteria than in a previous right classifcation??&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Many thanx&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:43:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/maxlike-classification-problem/m-p/703316#M2263</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulagarcia_llamas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-16T14:43:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

