<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interpreting weighted kernel density results in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/interpreting-weighted-kernel-density-results/m-p/620134#M1979</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The attached image shows a kernel density estimate based on tree locations.&amp;nbsp; A population field was used which included tree height and the search distance was set to approximately 5.64 m.&amp;nbsp; I am having a hard time trying to justify/explain the units on the output, especially since the ground-based average tree height is 0.59 meters.&amp;nbsp; The &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#/How_Kernel_Density_works/009z00000011000000/"&gt;documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; states that if a population field is specified, the population value will be used to weight the KDE.&amp;nbsp; For example, if I assign the population field to "Tree Height (m)" a tree that is 3m tall will be counted 3 times for the KDE.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is it appropriate to weight the KDE based on tree height?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What do the actual values mean in the attached graphic?&amp;nbsp; Are these points estimates of average tree height in a given area?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]20915[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:40:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AaronPoznanovic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-21T12:40:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interpreting weighted kernel density results</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/interpreting-weighted-kernel-density-results/m-p/620134#M1979</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The attached image shows a kernel density estimate based on tree locations.&amp;nbsp; A population field was used which included tree height and the search distance was set to approximately 5.64 m.&amp;nbsp; I am having a hard time trying to justify/explain the units on the output, especially since the ground-based average tree height is 0.59 meters.&amp;nbsp; The &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#/How_Kernel_Density_works/009z00000011000000/"&gt;documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; states that if a population field is specified, the population value will be used to weight the KDE.&amp;nbsp; For example, if I assign the population field to "Tree Height (m)" a tree that is 3m tall will be counted 3 times for the KDE.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is it appropriate to weight the KDE based on tree height?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What do the actual values mean in the attached graphic?&amp;nbsp; Are these points estimates of average tree height in a given area?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]20915[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:40:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/interpreting-weighted-kernel-density-results/m-p/620134#M1979</guid>
      <dc:creator>AaronPoznanovic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-21T12:40:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

