<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hot Spot Analysis For Virus Incident Data in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-for-virus-incident-data/m-p/604999#M1941</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NobuhleMatanga</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-22T14:34:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hot Spot Analysis For Virus Incident Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-for-virus-incident-data/m-p/604997#M1939</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running a hot spot analysis on point data representing samples that have been submitted for rabies testing, the values for each point is either 0 (sample came back negative) or 1(sample came back positive).&amp;nbsp; Is better to integrate and collect&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; only the positive samples and run a hot spot analysis on those samples, or is it possible to include all the point data in the analysis?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 12:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-for-virus-incident-data/m-p/604997#M1939</guid>
      <dc:creator>NobuhleMatanga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-22T12:35:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hot Spot Analysis For Virus Incident Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-for-virus-incident-data/m-p/604998#M1940</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would include both.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The absence of an object or phenomenon is just as valid as its presence.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact, the absence at a location may indicate that there is something positive about its environment that leads to this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;People often focus on the 'presence' of things, erroneously ignoring that 'absence' may be of equal or more importance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your particular case... maybe there are hot spots of 'absences' of rabies&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why would the absence be more important than the presence? &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/wink.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:02:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-for-virus-incident-data/m-p/604998#M1940</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-22T13:02:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hot Spot Analysis For Virus Incident Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-for-virus-incident-data/m-p/604999#M1941</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-for-virus-incident-data/m-p/604999#M1941</guid>
      <dc:creator>NobuhleMatanga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-22T14:34:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

