<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why do we get different COtypes or outliers on repeating the &amp;quot;Optimized Outlier analysis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Cluster and Outlier analysis&amp;quot; in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/why-do-we-get-different-cotypes-or-outliers-on/m-p/567982#M1821</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Different results can happen for a couple different reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Parallel processing can affect precision of the analysis which can create slightly different results from run to run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Permutations&amp;nbsp;will also create slightly different results.&amp;nbsp; You can fix this in one of 2 ways.&amp;nbsp; You can set the permutations parameter to 0 or you can use the Random Number Generator Environment.&amp;nbsp; If you set the random seed to anything other than 0 (let's say 2 and then use the seed 2 every time), you should receive the same results every run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this was helpful.&amp;nbsp; Let me know if you have any other questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Jenora&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JenoraD_Acosta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-29T22:05:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why do we get different COtypes or outliers on repeating the "Optimized Outlier analysis" and "Cluster and Outlier analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/why-do-we-get-different-cotypes-or-outliers-on/m-p/567981#M1820</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in; margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in; margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;I am new to ArcGIS and am looking&amp;nbsp;to find&amp;nbsp;outliers (high and low) in my data. The variable I am using is a disease severity variable ranging from 0 to 60 (i.e.&amp;nbsp;my analysis field). I am trying to find outliers in this variable. However, I recently figured that each time I run the Optimized outlier analysis or the cluster and outlier analysis, there&amp;nbsp;is a good proportion of observations with&amp;nbsp;changed&amp;nbsp;COtypes/p-values, or that I am finding different outlier observations on each run. Although I see that a good proportion are the same when repeated, I am concerned&amp;nbsp;with this change and don't understand why this is happening.&amp;nbsp;I would really appreciate it if&amp;nbsp;anyone could explain why this happens with outlier analysis (Local Moran’s I?) and can I trust that the outliers produced, although different in each run are actually outliers that I can use for my study? Thank you very much for your kind responses.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 23:03:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/why-do-we-get-different-cotypes-or-outliers-on/m-p/567981#M1820</guid>
      <dc:creator>PoojanShrestha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-24T23:03:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why do we get different COtypes or outliers on repeating the "Optimized Outlier analysis" and "Cluster and Outlier analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/why-do-we-get-different-cotypes-or-outliers-on/m-p/567982#M1821</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Different results can happen for a couple different reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Parallel processing can affect precision of the analysis which can create slightly different results from run to run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Permutations&amp;nbsp;will also create slightly different results.&amp;nbsp; You can fix this in one of 2 ways.&amp;nbsp; You can set the permutations parameter to 0 or you can use the Random Number Generator Environment.&amp;nbsp; If you set the random seed to anything other than 0 (let's say 2 and then use the seed 2 every time), you should receive the same results every run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this was helpful.&amp;nbsp; Let me know if you have any other questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Jenora&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/why-do-we-get-different-cotypes-or-outliers-on/m-p/567982#M1821</guid>
      <dc:creator>JenoraD_Acosta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-29T22:05:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

