<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Space Time Cube with normalized variable in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523961#M1685</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't like the idea of normalizing that type of case.&amp;nbsp; I know why you want to do it, but it creates 'fake' hotspot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps you can show what you are working with.&amp;nbsp; I would also make one suggestion ... map the areas with an explicit class where gas meters just don't exist at all.&amp;nbsp; Anything that you map on top of that will make it quite clear that those areas are out of bounds.&amp;nbsp; Maybe your 1 failure out of 2 meters will become more obvious.&amp;nbsp; I often see people mapping 'what' they have without explicitly delineating where 'what' can't exist&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 16:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-31T16:00:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Space Time Cube with normalized variable</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523960#M1684</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at analysing numbers of gas service pipe failures to find emerging hotspots. Because there could be different numbers of properties with gas meters in whichever polygon aggregation I use (postcodes, hexagons etc.) I think that ideally the data should be normalised, i.e. failure rate = number of failures / number of gas meters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to create a space time cube that will calculate this failure rate rather than just use the non-normalised count of failures? Or is there some workaround to get the same result to use with the emerging hot spot analysis tool?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 15:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523960#M1684</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanEvans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-31T15:44:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Space Time Cube with normalized variable</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523961#M1685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't like the idea of normalizing that type of case.&amp;nbsp; I know why you want to do it, but it creates 'fake' hotspot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps you can show what you are working with.&amp;nbsp; I would also make one suggestion ... map the areas with an explicit class where gas meters just don't exist at all.&amp;nbsp; Anything that you map on top of that will make it quite clear that those areas are out of bounds.&amp;nbsp; Maybe your 1 failure out of 2 meters will become more obvious.&amp;nbsp; I often see people mapping 'what' they have without explicitly delineating where 'what' can't exist&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 16:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523961#M1685</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-31T16:00:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Space Time Cube with normalized variable</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523962#M1686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is an example of the data I'm working with. Each dot is at a centroid of a postcode unit, and represents one service pipe failure at that unit (so there are stacks of dots where there's been more than one failure in that postcode).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've also done a standard hotspot analysis with the failures summarised so that there is only one dot at each location with a count of the total number of failures over a five year period.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I could instead use polygons of each postcode unit and use those with no gas meters as the locations where failures cannot exist, if that sounds sensible to you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/410345_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 16:08:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523962#M1686</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanEvans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-31T16:08:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Space Time Cube with normalized variable</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523963#M1687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;last sentence yes.... because your map... even if hotspot analysis might make someone go whoa! pretty significant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;blot out the 'Void' and you might want to consider just focusing in on the major communities at an appropriate zoom level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nothing will be gained by showing an overview map IMHO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 16:51:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/space-time-cube-with-normalized-variable/m-p/523963#M1687</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-31T16:51:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

