topic Re: Choosing conceptualization of spatial relationships - hot spot analysis in Spatial Statistics Questions

Choosing conceptualization of spatial relationships - hot spot analysis

CarlaPezzulo — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:13:55 GMT

Hello, I am new to this forum so apologies if this topic has been raised already. I couldn't find any previous post which actually fully helped with my case. I have circa 270 polygons of different size and shapes for some countries in Asia. A few polygons are dispersed in space, but still have neighbours.

My aim is to run Hot spot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) on health related rates. I have run Global Moran's I using different spatial relationships, and I get the highest values of Global Moran's I when using contiguity methods and K-nearest neighbour with 8 neighbours.

All the 3 methods (contiguity edges only, corners, k-nn) result in Global Moran's I index = 0.70 more or less. On what basis do i choose between the three? Are there any pro and cons in using any of the 3 methods with the type of data that i have (poly with different size and shapes)? Should i rather go for a distance based methods?

Thank you!

Re: Choosing conceptualization of spatial relationships - hot spot analysis

WilliamMeyer — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:43:46 GMT

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

Carla,

Hot Spot analysis is approximate, especially Hot Spot analysis using polygons. That said the fellow that wrote the book on how to use hot spot analysis for polygons in my opinion was Luc Anselin using his GeoDa analysis engine. I would refer you to Luc's work to gain better insights into your analysis. If you want to e-mail him directly he currently is on faculty at the University of Chicago.

Best of Luck.

Bill Meyer

U.S. Army ERDC

Champaign, Il

Re: Choosing conceptualization of spatial relationships - hot spot analysis

RyanRuthart1 — Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:07:06 GMT

The three methods (contiguity edges, edges + corner, k-nn) may be using similar neighborhoods for analysis. Depending on the layout of the polygons contiguity edges and edges + corner can produce very similar neighborhoods if there are few polygons that are only connected by a corner. Using edges + corners can have a big impact if you have a regular spaced grid (fishnet) as you double the neighborhood from 4 edges to 8 with edges + corners.

In this example polygon data set the majority of polygons are connected by edges

You can try to assess the number of neighbors each polygon is getting by using the Polygon Neighbors Tool it will create a table with a row for each polygon and its neighboring polygons. Using the Summary Statistics tool with a case field (group field) by the src_OBJECTID and counting the nbr_OBJECTID will produce a table with the number of neighbours for each polygon. If you create a bar chart using the number of neighbors you can see the distribution of number of neighbors. If the average distribution of number of neighbors is similar to the number of neighbors used in the analysis, it could help explain the similar results.

Table from Polygon Neighbors Tool

Results from Summary Statistics Tool

Chart showing distribution of number of neighbors

Re: Choosing conceptualization of spatial relationships - hot spot analysis

CarlaPezzulo — Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:20:23 GMT

Thank you for the advice! Best

Re: Choosing conceptualization of spatial relationships - hot spot analysis

CarlaPezzulo — Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:21:05 GMT

Thank you! I will look into this. Best