<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Geographically Weighted Regression Assumptions, Variable selection, and Predictive Ability in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/geographically-weighted-regression-assumptions/m-p/457826#M1404</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are a number of threads on GWR,&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/message/225666#225666"&gt; for example&lt;/A&gt;, which ones have you examined to limit the discussion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-08T20:07:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geographically Weighted Regression Assumptions, Variable selection, and Predictive Ability</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/geographically-weighted-regression-assumptions/m-p/457825#M1403</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am using observation data from several countries to develop maps that predict the concentration of trace elements in soils.&amp;nbsp; I have ~20,000 observations and&amp;nbsp; have several rasters that describe the environment (e.g., climate, precipitation, temperature, etc.). All of this data is highly correlated spatially and observations are not independent (i.e., data from pixels/observations are more likely to be similar if they are closer in proximity).&amp;nbsp; In order to account for this, I was hoping to use ArcMAPs (10.2) geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having trouble finding documentation on the assumptions of&amp;nbsp; the GWR analysis and how the model selection works.&amp;nbsp; For example, if you do a quick search for linear regression &lt;SPAN style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;assumptions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;, you will easily find that linear regression requires as linear relationship between dependent and independent variables, constant variance, independence of samples, etc.&amp;nbsp; I have not found a list of corresponding assumptions for GWR.&amp;nbsp; I suspect they are the same, but I need to be able to cite a source that describes the assumptions so I can adequately show that each assumption was addressed.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know where I can find a list of these assumptions?&amp;nbsp; For example, can GWR handle parabolic relationships or does the data need to be linearized first before entered into the model?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, it seems to me that GWR is more of a "black box" tool.&amp;nbsp; When I enter multiple independent or explanatory variables, does GWR enter all the variables at once, or does it enter the variables stepwise, and hence the use of AICc?&amp;nbsp; Is there documentation on the criteria for how a model is entered into the model (e.g., F to Enter &amp;amp; F to Remove)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, I would like to use GWR to predict how concentrations will change as the input variables change.&amp;nbsp; With OLS, this is easy given the global regression equation.&amp;nbsp; Since GWR calculates parameters locally instead of globally, how can I use a GWR in ArcMAP to predict how changes in input variables will affect the output, similar to a traditional linear model?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for your time and help.&amp;nbsp; I greatly appreciate it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerrad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:02:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/geographically-weighted-regression-assumptions/m-p/457825#M1403</guid>
      <dc:creator>GerradJones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-18T13:02:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geographically Weighted Regression Assumptions, Variable selection, and Predictive Ability</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/geographically-weighted-regression-assumptions/m-p/457826#M1404</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are a number of threads on GWR,&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/message/225666#225666"&gt; for example&lt;/A&gt;, which ones have you examined to limit the discussion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/geographically-weighted-regression-assumptions/m-p/457826#M1404</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-08T20:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

