<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hot Spots on linear features appropriate? in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spots-on-linear-features-appropriate/m-p/449450#M1355</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it appropriate to run a Hot Spots analysis on linearly referenced features (I want to find deer-vehicle collision hotspots on a highway and so I have 100-m segmented road with the number of collisions as events).&amp;nbsp; The tool allows it but I am not sure whether the underlying assumption of randomly located collisions is being applied to only the linear features rather than the entire space within the extent of the linear features.&amp;nbsp; In other words, is the tool detecting clusters merely because the collisions can only be on the linear feature (ie they cannot occur off-road) or does the tool "know" that the events can only occur on the linear feature?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I like the results I am getting but not sure about the underlying assumptions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for any insights!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cilla&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PriscillaCoe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-28T15:12:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hot Spots on linear features appropriate?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spots-on-linear-features-appropriate/m-p/449450#M1355</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it appropriate to run a Hot Spots analysis on linearly referenced features (I want to find deer-vehicle collision hotspots on a highway and so I have 100-m segmented road with the number of collisions as events).&amp;nbsp; The tool allows it but I am not sure whether the underlying assumption of randomly located collisions is being applied to only the linear features rather than the entire space within the extent of the linear features.&amp;nbsp; In other words, is the tool detecting clusters merely because the collisions can only be on the linear feature (ie they cannot occur off-road) or does the tool "know" that the events can only occur on the linear feature?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I like the results I am getting but not sure about the underlying assumptions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for any insights!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cilla&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spots-on-linear-features-appropriate/m-p/449450#M1355</guid>
      <dc:creator>PriscillaCoe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-28T15:12:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

