<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic K nearest neighbors or other conceptualization for Hot Spot Analyisis in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/k-nearest-neighbors-or-other-conceptualization-for/m-p/432683#M1336</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a dataset which are skewed (not normally distributed).&amp;nbsp; And I have used SPSS to prove that by applying the normality test. Under this situation, do I use the K nearest neighbors with 8 neighbors as suggested by the documentation for the Hot Spot Analysis or other conceptualization like fixed distance band with neighbor parameter.&amp;nbsp; I have found out the results from these two conceptualizations are quite different (maybe due to the skewed nature of the data).&amp;nbsp; So I would like to know which conceptualization I should choose based on your experience.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Franky&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:34:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HuaqiYuan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-21T16:34:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>K nearest neighbors or other conceptualization for Hot Spot Analyisis</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/k-nearest-neighbors-or-other-conceptualization-for/m-p/432683#M1336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a dataset which are skewed (not normally distributed).&amp;nbsp; And I have used SPSS to prove that by applying the normality test. Under this situation, do I use the K nearest neighbors with 8 neighbors as suggested by the documentation for the Hot Spot Analysis or other conceptualization like fixed distance band with neighbor parameter.&amp;nbsp; I have found out the results from these two conceptualizations are quite different (maybe due to the skewed nature of the data).&amp;nbsp; So I would like to know which conceptualization I should choose based on your experience.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Franky&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:34:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/k-nearest-neighbors-or-other-conceptualization-for/m-p/432683#M1336</guid>
      <dc:creator>HuaqiYuan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-21T16:34:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: K nearest neighbors or other conceptualization for Hot Spot Analyisis</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/k-nearest-neighbors-or-other-conceptualization-for/m-p/432684#M1337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Franky, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You are right that if your data is skewed you want to ensure that your features all have at least several neighbors, and 8 is a good rule of thumb.&amp;nbsp; The question of whether to use K-nearest neighbors or fixed distance is really determined by the question that you're asking.&amp;nbsp; Fixed distance is often a good option because it ensures that your scale is consistent across the whole study area, but if you want to ensure that all of your features have at least 8 neighbors what you might want to do is use the "Generate Spatial Weights Matrix tool", which allows you to set a fixed distance (and choose your fixed distance according to the question that you're asking), and then optionally lets you set a minimum number of neighbors.&amp;nbsp; That way it will use the fixed distance band everywhere, but for those features where the fixed distance does not ensure that a feature has 8 neighbors, it will extend the distance just for those features to ensure they have the minimum number of neighbors that you set.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Lauren Rosenshein&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Geoprocessing Product Engineer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/k-nearest-neighbors-or-other-conceptualization-for/m-p/432684#M1337</guid>
      <dc:creator>LaurenRosenshein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-14T16:38:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: K nearest neighbors or other conceptualization for Hot Spot Analyisis</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/k-nearest-neighbors-or-other-conceptualization-for/m-p/432685#M1338</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Lauren,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do you happen to know the algorithm behind the K nearest neighbor option? For example, is it measuring feature edge to feature edge or centroid to centroid?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks. Ryan&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/k-nearest-neighbors-or-other-conceptualization-for/m-p/432685#M1338</guid>
      <dc:creator>RyanWilliams1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T15:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

