<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Conceptualization of Spatial Relationships in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/conceptualization-of-spatial-relationships/m-p/396823#M1294</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is no option for Polygon Contiguity (First order) in this parameter.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is an explanation of it's funtion in the help along with: Inverse Distance, Inverse Distance Squared,Fixed Distance Band,Zone of Indifference,Get Spatial Weights From File.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Why is this missing?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ArnoldGerber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-05T06:03:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Conceptualization of Spatial Relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/conceptualization-of-spatial-relationships/m-p/396823#M1294</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is no option for Polygon Contiguity (First order) in this parameter.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is an explanation of it's funtion in the help along with: Inverse Distance, Inverse Distance Squared,Fixed Distance Band,Zone of Indifference,Get Spatial Weights From File.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Why is this missing?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/conceptualization-of-spatial-relationships/m-p/396823#M1294</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArnoldGerber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-05T06:03:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conceptualization of Spatial Relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/conceptualization-of-spatial-relationships/m-p/396824#M1295</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Arnold, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's a great question.&amp;nbsp; I'm guessing that you are using the Generate Spatial Weights Matrix tool, which would explain why you aren't seeing the Polygon Contiguity (First Order) option in the drop-down. In the Generate Spatial Weights Matrix tool, there are actually two options for polygon contiguity...Contiguity_Edges_Only and Contiguity_Edges_Corners.&amp;nbsp; The Contiguity_Edges_Only option is the exact same conceptualization as Polygon Contiguity (First Order)...they both use edges only to determine if features are neighbors, while the Contiguity_Edges_Corners option uses either edges OR corners.&amp;nbsp; A good way to think about this is by visualizing a chess board.&amp;nbsp; The Contiguity_Edges_Only and Polygon Contiguity (First Order) options consider features neighbors ONLY if they are directly next to each other (ie they share edges).&amp;nbsp; The Contiguity_Edges_Corners option considers features neighbors if they are next to each other, and also if they are diagonal to each other with a corner touching.&amp;nbsp; See attached image.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So, there are several tools in the Spatial Statistics toolbox that refer to the edges-only option as Polygon Contiguity (first order)...including hot spot analysis, spatial autocorrelation, cluster and outlier analysis, and high/low clustering.&amp;nbsp; The Generate Spatial Weights Matrix tool, however, calls this option CONTIGUITY_EDGES_ONLY because there are two options and those names are more descriptive.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Lauren Rosenshein&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Geoprocessing Product Engineer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/conceptualization-of-spatial-relationships/m-p/396824#M1295</guid>
      <dc:creator>LaurenRosenshein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-14T20:13:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

