<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Optimized Hot Spot Analysis - Point vs. Area problem in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-point-vs-area-problem/m-p/378930#M1232</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm running the optimized hot spot tool in order to determine locations suited to host new guesthouses.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Therefore i want to exclude areas from a predefined study area (polygon) which are unsuited. The outputs from two hotspot analyses shall generate the areas which are to be excluded. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The problem:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As the standard hotspot output are points of statistically significant hot or cold spots, they are unsuited for this task since points don't really reflect an area. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fishnet cells (which can be generated as output of hot spot analysis) would be a solution but only work if there's no analysis field specified for the point data analyzed. For one of my analyses this is the case - for the other unfortunately not.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My question:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it statiscally allowed to somehow create a hot spot area / surface (not a density surface!) from the hot spot points such as a buffer around the points?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Would the statistic significance also apply for the whole buffer area, if this buffer would have the distance band used for the hot spot analysis as a radius? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As both distance bands are several 100 meters the buffers would cover my whole study area and thus no positive locations would remain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So if buffer is fine, which radius would I have to choose? &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Doesn't the same problem apply to hot spot analysis with fishnet cells?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How does a fishnet cell (which is an area and not a point!) as an output of a hotspot analysis maintain the statistic integrity? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for your thoughts!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Torben&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TorbenSchmack</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-05T11:31:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Optimized Hot Spot Analysis - Point vs. Area problem</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-point-vs-area-problem/m-p/378930#M1232</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm running the optimized hot spot tool in order to determine locations suited to host new guesthouses.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Therefore i want to exclude areas from a predefined study area (polygon) which are unsuited. The outputs from two hotspot analyses shall generate the areas which are to be excluded. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The problem:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As the standard hotspot output are points of statistically significant hot or cold spots, they are unsuited for this task since points don't really reflect an area. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fishnet cells (which can be generated as output of hot spot analysis) would be a solution but only work if there's no analysis field specified for the point data analyzed. For one of my analyses this is the case - for the other unfortunately not.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My question:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it statiscally allowed to somehow create a hot spot area / surface (not a density surface!) from the hot spot points such as a buffer around the points?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Would the statistic significance also apply for the whole buffer area, if this buffer would have the distance band used for the hot spot analysis as a radius? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As both distance bands are several 100 meters the buffers would cover my whole study area and thus no positive locations would remain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So if buffer is fine, which radius would I have to choose? &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Doesn't the same problem apply to hot spot analysis with fishnet cells?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How does a fishnet cell (which is an area and not a point!) as an output of a hotspot analysis maintain the statistic integrity? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for your thoughts!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Torben&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/optimized-hot-spot-analysis-point-vs-area-problem/m-p/378930#M1232</guid>
      <dc:creator>TorbenSchmack</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-05T11:31:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

