<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Are GWR results are valid when OLS is biased? in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/are-gwr-results-are-valid-when-ols-is-biased/m-p/375078#M1228</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing OLS and GWR at census tract level. I have included whatever variables that are in the literature (based on availability) and actually I do not have any other data to add at this level. But my OLS shows very low adjusted R2 (0.11) and significant jarque-Bera Statistic. Even running GWR, there is no improvement in adjusted R square and maximum local R2 is 0.20. The low to high coefficient surfaces show a west-east pattern and in&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;almost all of&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;variables the coefficient sign (negative/positive) does not change&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;in the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;low to high coefficient.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with the OLS showing biased and these GWR results, can I still use GWR and report it in my paper as a valid analysis?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 05:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NastaranPourebrahim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-27T05:11:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are GWR results are valid when OLS is biased?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/are-gwr-results-are-valid-when-ols-is-biased/m-p/375078#M1228</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing OLS and GWR at census tract level. I have included whatever variables that are in the literature (based on availability) and actually I do not have any other data to add at this level. But my OLS shows very low adjusted R2 (0.11) and significant jarque-Bera Statistic. Even running GWR, there is no improvement in adjusted R square and maximum local R2 is 0.20. The low to high coefficient surfaces show a west-east pattern and in&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;almost all of&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;variables the coefficient sign (negative/positive) does not change&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;in the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;low to high coefficient.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with the OLS showing biased and these GWR results, can I still use GWR and report it in my paper as a valid analysis?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 05:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/are-gwr-results-are-valid-when-ols-is-biased/m-p/375078#M1228</guid>
      <dc:creator>NastaranPourebrahim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-27T05:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are GWR results are valid when OLS is biased?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/are-gwr-results-are-valid-when-ols-is-biased/m-p/375079#M1229</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the requirements for the use of a particular statistical test are not met, (for instance, normalcy) and transformations of the data to accommodate for this (for instance, a numeric transform) do not improve the situation, then the use of parametric statistics should be abandoned in favor of statistical measures/tests that make no underlying assumptions about the input data ( ie non-parametric statistics). &amp;nbsp; Regression is one example... if linear regression shows an exceptionally poor correlation and variable transformation does not reveal linearity, then one might move on to rank correlation (or other approaches).&amp;nbsp; There may be a time to accept that no correlation exists, no matter how hard one tries to squeeze one out.&amp;nbsp; The academic literature is full of such bad examples &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/wink.png" /&gt; ... don't contribute to it... instead, maybe you can provide some context as to what you are looking at, and what you think is going on.&amp;nbsp; An approach, a suggested statistical technique or method of analysis might be suggested that you hadn't thought of.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/are-gwr-results-are-valid-when-ols-is-biased/m-p/375079#M1229</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-29T13:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

