<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hot spot analysis indicated the areas with 0 value as hot spot? in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-indicated-the-areas-with-0-value/m-p/314708#M1058</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I'm trying to do hot spot analysis using ArcGIS 10.1 and I have a question--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; When examine the result, I found that many polygons marked as hot spot were actually with 0 &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;value&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, which should have been cold spots. I understand that &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;hotpost&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; analysis calculates the values within a certain defined &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;areas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; instead of the original polygons, but is this normal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Some more background:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I tried to look at whether there is cluster of psychiatric patients in a county. I have census tract data &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;with&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; a column showing how many psychiatric patients are there in a census tract. There are many&amp;nbsp; (more than a half) census tracts without any psychiatric patients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I used both fixed distance band and spatial weights matrix to do the hot spot analysis. When used fixed distance band, I used spatial auto correlation to generate the distance, and I choose the max peak, (because &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; when &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;first peak&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;occured&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, some features had no neighbor). Both fixed distance band and spatial weights matrix methods yield the similar result (tracts with 0 &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;value&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; are marked as hot spots).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I really appreciate if anyone can offer me any suggestion. Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:09:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>YiyueHuangfu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-16T15:09:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hot spot analysis indicated the areas with 0 value as hot spot?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-indicated-the-areas-with-0-value/m-p/314708#M1058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I'm trying to do hot spot analysis using ArcGIS 10.1 and I have a question--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; When examine the result, I found that many polygons marked as hot spot were actually with 0 &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;value&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, which should have been cold spots. I understand that &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;hotpost&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; analysis calculates the values within a certain defined &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;areas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; instead of the original polygons, but is this normal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Some more background:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I tried to look at whether there is cluster of psychiatric patients in a county. I have census tract data &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;with&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; a column showing how many psychiatric patients are there in a census tract. There are many&amp;nbsp; (more than a half) census tracts without any psychiatric patients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I used both fixed distance band and spatial weights matrix to do the hot spot analysis. When used fixed distance band, I used spatial auto correlation to generate the distance, and I choose the max peak, (because &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; when &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;first peak&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;occured&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, some features had no neighbor). Both fixed distance band and spatial weights matrix methods yield the similar result (tracts with 0 &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;value&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; are marked as hot spots).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I really appreciate if anyone can offer me any suggestion. Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:09:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/hot-spot-analysis-indicated-the-areas-with-0-value/m-p/314708#M1058</guid>
      <dc:creator>YiyueHuangfu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-16T15:09:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

