<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Possible problem with standard error calculation for Nearest Neighbor Statistic? in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/possible-problem-with-standard-error-calculation/m-p/301355#M1006</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is great.&amp;nbsp; Thank you so much William for helping me understand the differences between the two equations.&amp;nbsp; I guess what had me really confused was that the first paper had the equation for standard error, whereas the second had the equation for the standard deviation.&amp;nbsp; I am still a little shaky on the derivation of this equation, but I understand it enough to implement it properly.&amp;nbsp; Thanks again.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WinnKetchum</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-21T17:44:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Possible problem with standard error calculation for Nearest Neighbor Statistic?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/possible-problem-with-standard-error-calculation/m-p/301354#M1005</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So I noticed today that the equation used to calculate the standard error for the nearest neighbor statistic is 0.26136/((N**2/A)**0.5).&amp;nbsp; This seems to be the same as the equation given by Clark and Evan (1954).&amp;nbsp; However the equation Clark and Evan give in 1979 is 0.26136/((N/A)**0.5).&amp;nbsp; This seems to be a problem, as the equation I use for the standard error for 3-dimensions also comes from the 1979 paper and is 0.20136/((N/V)**0.3333), where V is the volume.&amp;nbsp; Does this mean that this last equation should really be 0.20136/((N**3/V)**0.3333) and that it is wrong in Clark and Evan's 1979 paper as well?&amp;nbsp; If anyone has an answer to this or an explanation, I would greatly appreciate it.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I attached the 1979 paper in case you need it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Winn&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:25:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/possible-problem-with-standard-error-calculation/m-p/301354#M1005</guid>
      <dc:creator>WinnKetchum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T18:25:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible problem with standard error calculation for Nearest Neighbor Statistic?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/possible-problem-with-standard-error-calculation/m-p/301355#M1006</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is great.&amp;nbsp; Thank you so much William for helping me understand the differences between the two equations.&amp;nbsp; I guess what had me really confused was that the first paper had the equation for standard error, whereas the second had the equation for the standard deviation.&amp;nbsp; I am still a little shaky on the derivation of this equation, but I understand it enough to implement it properly.&amp;nbsp; Thanks again.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/possible-problem-with-standard-error-calculation/m-p/301355#M1006</guid>
      <dc:creator>WinnKetchum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-21T17:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

