<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Site Scan report- height error in Site Scan Manager Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/site-scan-manager-questions/site-scan-report-height-error/m-p/1118793#M125</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/505547"&gt;@mpgeof24&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The "height error" you're referring to is from the "absolute geolocation variance" table from the processing report, this is the determined &lt;STRONG&gt;geolocation error of the input images&lt;/STRONG&gt;. It's expected to see values in the range shown in your processing report when using images that have not been corrected using RTK or PPK.&amp;nbsp; This does not affect the accuracy of your outputs because you used Ground Control Points, so there isn't anything that needs to be fixed in that regard.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How did you determine that the absolute&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;height of your photos is correct? My suspicion is that it isn't.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Relative height should be quite accurate (measured above takeoff point). Select a photo that is near a GCP, look up its relative height and add it to the GCP elevation, does this match the absolute height recorded in the EXIF?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Looking at your processing report, there's a relatively high geolocation error at your GCPs. If your GCPs were surveyed accurately, are clearly identifiable and were tagged/measured precisely, this error at the GCPs should be close to 0.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The GCP projection error column shows one value above 1 pixel. This may indicate that the GCPs were not tagged precisely and consistently, or not tagged in enough photos. I encourage you to review your GCP tags in each photo and ensure that they are precisely in the surveyed location. I also suggest adding a few tags per GCP to ensure you have at&amp;nbsp; 6-8 photos marked per target. All GCP projection error values should be below 1 pixel, ideally near 0.5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Nico&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:17:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NicoBonnafoux</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-19T18:17:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Site Scan report- height error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/site-scan-manager-questions/site-scan-report-height-error/m-p/1118689#M124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a problem with absolute geolocation varriance for my master thesis project. I used DJI Phantom 4 Pro v2.0 drone and&amp;nbsp; took photos. I used 6 GCP points which were measured with Trimble R8 (local coordinate system HTRS 96 TM) . When i look to EXIF&amp;nbsp; data height of my photos they are ok (absolute and relative)&amp;nbsp; and obtained 2D and 3D products in Site Scan have correct height ( HTRS 96 TM c.s.). In processing report absolute geolocation for X and Y is around 1 meter, and Z is -70 meters. How can i correct that 70 meters for Z and whats is cause of that. In attachment is my processing report.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/site-scan-manager-questions/site-scan-report-height-error/m-p/1118689#M124</guid>
      <dc:creator>mpgeof24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-19T15:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Scan report- height error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/site-scan-manager-questions/site-scan-report-height-error/m-p/1118793#M125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/505547"&gt;@mpgeof24&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The "height error" you're referring to is from the "absolute geolocation variance" table from the processing report, this is the determined &lt;STRONG&gt;geolocation error of the input images&lt;/STRONG&gt;. It's expected to see values in the range shown in your processing report when using images that have not been corrected using RTK or PPK.&amp;nbsp; This does not affect the accuracy of your outputs because you used Ground Control Points, so there isn't anything that needs to be fixed in that regard.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How did you determine that the absolute&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;height of your photos is correct? My suspicion is that it isn't.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Relative height should be quite accurate (measured above takeoff point). Select a photo that is near a GCP, look up its relative height and add it to the GCP elevation, does this match the absolute height recorded in the EXIF?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Looking at your processing report, there's a relatively high geolocation error at your GCPs. If your GCPs were surveyed accurately, are clearly identifiable and were tagged/measured precisely, this error at the GCPs should be close to 0.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The GCP projection error column shows one value above 1 pixel. This may indicate that the GCPs were not tagged precisely and consistently, or not tagged in enough photos. I encourage you to review your GCP tags in each photo and ensure that they are precisely in the surveyed location. I also suggest adding a few tags per GCP to ensure you have at&amp;nbsp; 6-8 photos marked per target. All GCP projection error values should be below 1 pixel, ideally near 0.5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Nico&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:17:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/site-scan-manager-questions/site-scan-report-height-error/m-p/1118793#M125</guid>
      <dc:creator>NicoBonnafoux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-19T18:17:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

