<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Replacement for IDLE in 10.1 in Python Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97010#M7505</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I rather like IDLE.... but then, I like vi too...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:24:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>markdenil</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-15T18:24:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replacement for IDLE in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97003#M7498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I used to use PythonWin in 10 but apparently (at least that I have seen) there is no updated version for Python 2.7 yet (installed with 10.1).&amp;nbsp; Does anyone have any recommendations that they know is supported in Desktop 10.1 / Python 2.7?&amp;nbsp; My co-worker tried installing PyScripter but it failed in 10.1 as well.&amp;nbsp; I am not a big fan of using the out of the box IDLE.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:47:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97003#M7498</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomHoober</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T14:47:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacement for IDLE in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97004#M7499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PyScripter is what I use for 10.1 without any issues.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97004#M7499</guid>
      <dc:creator>MathewCoyle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T15:04:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacement for IDLE in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97005#M7500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ok.&amp;nbsp; As I have personally not done the install for that I cannot say if it was a mistake during the installation or if it was an actual software incompatiblity.&amp;nbsp; Do you know if &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://code.google.com/p/pyscripter/downloads/detail?name=PyScripter-v2.5.3.zip"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; is what I am looking for?&amp;nbsp; I assume that since Desktop is not yet 64 bit that the Python they have is 32 as well?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97005#M7500</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomHoober</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T15:11:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacement for IDLE in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97006#M7501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Correct, you will need the 32 bit version. I am pretty sure I just used the exe to install, but there shouldn't be an issue either way.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:18:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97006#M7501</guid>
      <dc:creator>MathewCoyle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T15:18:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacement for IDLE in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97007#M7502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for all your help.&amp;nbsp; I brought it up with my co-worker and he confirmed he tried to do a 64 bit install.&amp;nbsp; I just ran the 32 bit installer and everything worked out fine.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for your help and the quickness of your responses.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97007#M7502</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomHoober</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T15:30:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PythonWin in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97008#M7503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Ok.&amp;nbsp; As I have personally not done the install for that I cannot say if it was a mistake during the installation or if it was an actual software incompatiblity.... I assume that since Desktop is not yet 64 bit that the Python they have is 32 as well?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The help says PythonWin is still shipped with the software, but I can't find it in my distribution. It does work with ArcGIS 10.1.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PythonWin can be downloaded here. (Go the most recent build and look for the file "pywin32-xxx.win32-py2.7.exe")&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/pywin32/files/pywin32"&gt;sourceforge.net/projects/pywin32/files/pywin32&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A future update to Desktop 10.1 is being tested that allows 64 bit background processing on ArcGIS Desktop -- though you will probably continue to do ArcGIS script development using Python-32.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In addition to its capable IDE, PythonWin includes windows-specific modules that allow you to easily interact with the Win32API, Office apps, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Personally, I'm a big fan of &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://wingide.com"&gt;WingIDE.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; I have found it well worth the $100 for the Pro version.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:30:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97008#M7503</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T15:30:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacement for IDLE in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97009#M7504</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That was the main problem I saw with PythonWin with 10.1, the discrepency between them saying that it comes with the software and the reality that it doesn't.&amp;nbsp; That made me a little worried because I witnessed what happpens when you install a Python IDE that doesn't mesh with Arc (basically it gets real messy).&amp;nbsp; However, I can see on that page that it does support 2.7, so it looks like I can run with it as well.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for your input as also.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:37:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97009#M7504</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomHoober</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T15:37:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacement for IDLE in 10.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97010#M7505</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I rather like IDLE.... but then, I like vi too...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:24:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/replacement-for-idle-in-10-1/m-p/97010#M7505</guid>
      <dc:creator>markdenil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-15T18:24:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

