<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: For Union_analysis result:  Will FID attribute for these gap features all be -1? in Python Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640339#M49892</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I figured it out now. Many thanks, Dan!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 01:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CarolLiu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-03T01:16:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>For Union_analysis result:  Will FID attribute for these gap features all be -1?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640334#M49887</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used union_analysis on 2 polygon features. The resulting table did show -1 for some of FID attributes. But when I checked the details on ArcMap, I found out that FID attributes for a lot of gap features were not -1 (instead 18, 22, etc). Does anybody know why? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 19:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640334#M49887</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarolLiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-02T19:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Union_analysis result:  Will FID attribute for these gap features all be -1?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640335#M49888</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the help &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/analysis-toolbox/union.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/analysis-toolbox/union.htm"&gt;Union—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop&lt;/A&gt; did you specify gaps or no gaps? they produce different outputs depending upon the union and what happens when gaps are identified.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps a figure would help if you have an example that could be used for commentary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 19:56:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640335#M49888</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-02T19:56:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Union_analysis result:  Will FID attribute for these gap features all be -1?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640336#M49889</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just tried both (setting gaps/no-gaps). It did not make any difference. 3 screenshots have been enclosed down. Scenario: FireBoxMap layer is polygon (figure #1); FireBoxMap was converted to line; FireBoxMap_PolygonToLine_Buf layer was generated from FireBoxMap using 50 ft as buffer distance (figure #2); union_gap layer came from Union_Analysis of (FireBoxMap layer and FireBoxMap_PolygonToLine_Buf layer) with Gap Allowed (figure #3). The identify info shows the gap (highlight with green on the map). As seen, FID_FireBoxMap is 32, while FID_FireBoxMap_PolygonToLine_Buf is 52.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="union_issue_01.jpg" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/206685_union_issue_01.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 295px;" /&gt;&lt;IMG alt="union_issue_02.jpg" class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/206686_union_issue_02.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 289px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="union_issue_03.jpg" class="image-3 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/206729_union_issue_03.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 349px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:08:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640336#M49889</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarolLiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-02T22:08:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Union_analysis result:  Will FID attribute for these gap features all be -1?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640337#M49890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok... still confused, I see a green pencilled in area, but I don't see the record selected in the table.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:40:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640337#M49890</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-02T22:40:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Union_analysis result:  Will FID attribute for these gap features all be -1?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640338#M49891</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just did another screenshot. The same feature with highlight in Table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="union_issue_04.jpg" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/206730_union_issue_04.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 450px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 23:32:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640338#M49891</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarolLiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-02T23:32:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Union_analysis result:  Will FID attribute for these gap features all be -1?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640339#M49892</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I figured it out now. Many thanks, Dan!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 01:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/for-union-analysis-result-will-fid-attribute-for/m-p/640339#M49892</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarolLiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-03T01:16:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

