<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Python the road ahead in Python Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548719#M42858</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Baby steps, I guess....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-14T17:42:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Python the road ahead</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548716#M42855</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just sitting in 'Python Across the ArcGIS Platform': big take away is they "have heard us" and the ability to update as opposed to re-create clones with Pro version updates in on the road map!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3116"&gt;Dan Patterson&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548716#M42855</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-14T15:31:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python the road ahead</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548717#M42856</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Points raised on Beta &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/wink.png" /&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The big disappointment for me is sticking with 3.6, meaning 3.7 (or probably 3.8) won't roll out until next year.&amp;nbsp; Lots of cool/new stuff in the latest incarnations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:10:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548717#M42856</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-14T16:10:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python the road ahead</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548718#M42857</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;And, we are still stuck with Conda 4.3.x even though Conda 4.4.x was released 12/2017 and the current Conda version is 4.8.x. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548718#M42857</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-14T16:42:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python the road ahead</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548719#M42858</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Baby steps, I guess....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548719#M42858</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-14T17:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python the road ahead</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548720#M42859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;good question... I will ask and go through the changelog to see why not&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda/en/latest/release-notes.html" title="https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda/en/latest/release-notes.html"&gt;Release notes — conda 4.8.3.post67+586742cb documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 20:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548720#M42859</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-14T20:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python the road ahead</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548721#M42860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Updating user environments on upgrade of Pro...? It's going to have potential for lots of issues - package versions, 3rd party channels. I treat conda envs as disposable, to be spun up and disposed of as required.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;It's a lot easier to build a fresh env than fix or update one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would really be useful is an updated conda.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 04:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548721#M42860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luke_Pinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T04:24:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python the road ahead</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548722#M42861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree, Luke, maintaining/updating user environments between Pro releases will end up creating more problems than it solves.&amp;nbsp; I am also concerned one outcome might be Esri slowing down their adoption of new Python releases, which is already slow.&amp;nbsp; I would much rather have the latest conda and Python versions and rebuild a user environment myself because as you mention, they are disposable and easily rebuilt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-the-road-ahead/m-p/548722#M42861</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T14:11:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

