<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pro Add Package Install Location in Python Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/pro-add-package-install-location/m-p/446832#M35059</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to install and access additional useful python modules in Pro, you are required to clone the environment.&amp;nbsp; If you use the default location for the clone all the required files are copied to that location which is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C:\Users\"User Name"\AppData\Local\ESRI\conda&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now if you choose a different (say simpler path) of&amp;nbsp;C:\Python_Clone_Pro, many files do go to this location, but other files such as added modules go to a default location that it not appear that you can change:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;C:\Users\&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"User Name"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;\AppData\Local\ESRI\conda.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any negative impacts to having this broken up environment where python files exist in 2 locations, instead of going with the default install location for the clones?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 15:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-30T15:39:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pro Add Package Install Location</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/pro-add-package-install-location/m-p/446832#M35059</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to install and access additional useful python modules in Pro, you are required to clone the environment.&amp;nbsp; If you use the default location for the clone all the required files are copied to that location which is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C:\Users\"User Name"\AppData\Local\ESRI\conda&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now if you choose a different (say simpler path) of&amp;nbsp;C:\Python_Clone_Pro, many files do go to this location, but other files such as added modules go to a default location that it not appear that you can change:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;C:\Users\&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"User Name"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;\AppData\Local\ESRI\conda.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any negative impacts to having this broken up environment where python files exist in 2 locations, instead of going with the default install location for the clones?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 15:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/pro-add-package-install-location/m-p/446832#M35059</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-30T15:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

