<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro in Python Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206369#M15875</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running arcpy stand-alone scripts with ArcGIS Pro (64-bit)&amp;nbsp;is supposed to be faster than ArcGIS 10.5, but it seems to be the opposite with my first&amp;nbsp;attempt at&amp;nbsp;converting a stand-alone script to use ArcGIS Pro.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The script is long, but among other things it uses Data Reviewer to run a few attribute checks.&amp;nbsp; I've narrowed down where the difference is -&amp;nbsp; specifically on ExecuteReviewerBatchJob_Reviewer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="language-python line-numbers"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;arcpy&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;ExecuteReviewerBatchJob_Reviewer&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;reviewer_gdb&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; currentSession&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; AttributesBatchJob&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; None&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; None&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"ALL_FEATURES"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; None&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="line-numbers-rows"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS 10.5 takes 1 minute&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Pro takes 5 minutes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps I'm doing it wrong, but my understanding is we should run a stand-alone script with Pro like so:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;call "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\bin\Python\scripts\propy.bat" C:\GISDataReview.py&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else seen negative impacts in running Python 3 vs 2.7&amp;nbsp;using the same script (and assuming syntax is corrected where needed for version 3)?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I wanted to compare apples to apples, but if it requires somehow re-working it for Pro I'm open to suggestions.&amp;nbsp; I made sure my Data Reviewer workspace is upgraded for Pro.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;When I run the execute batch job geoprocessing tool inside Pro it finishes in less than a minute.&amp;nbsp; This script needs to run as a scheduled task.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:24:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted-user-ZTub55yWbsya</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-17T21:24:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206369#M15875</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running arcpy stand-alone scripts with ArcGIS Pro (64-bit)&amp;nbsp;is supposed to be faster than ArcGIS 10.5, but it seems to be the opposite with my first&amp;nbsp;attempt at&amp;nbsp;converting a stand-alone script to use ArcGIS Pro.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The script is long, but among other things it uses Data Reviewer to run a few attribute checks.&amp;nbsp; I've narrowed down where the difference is -&amp;nbsp; specifically on ExecuteReviewerBatchJob_Reviewer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="language-python line-numbers"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;arcpy&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;ExecuteReviewerBatchJob_Reviewer&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;reviewer_gdb&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; currentSession&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; AttributesBatchJob&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; None&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; None&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"ALL_FEATURES"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; None&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="line-numbers-rows"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS 10.5 takes 1 minute&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Pro takes 5 minutes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps I'm doing it wrong, but my understanding is we should run a stand-alone script with Pro like so:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;call "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\bin\Python\scripts\propy.bat" C:\GISDataReview.py&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else seen negative impacts in running Python 3 vs 2.7&amp;nbsp;using the same script (and assuming syntax is corrected where needed for version 3)?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I wanted to compare apples to apples, but if it requires somehow re-working it for Pro I'm open to suggestions.&amp;nbsp; I made sure my Data Reviewer workspace is upgraded for Pro.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;When I run the execute batch job geoprocessing tool inside Pro it finishes in less than a minute.&amp;nbsp; This script needs to run as a scheduled task.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:24:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206369#M15875</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted-user-ZTub55yWbsya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T21:24:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206370#M15876</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: #3d3d3d; font-family: Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;"&gt;you could read for days on the 'which is faster...' debate.&amp;nbsp; In short, it depends... but overall 3.x, except for the thing that you are using.&amp;nbsp; This of course assumes pure python.&amp;nbsp; As soon as you throw other stuff into the mix then all bets are off and that would include anything Arc* related.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; You could decorate your functions if your code is arranged that way.&amp;nbsp; I found it useful for comparing function I used between 2/3 versions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample line-numbers language-none"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;def&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="token function"&gt;time_deco&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;func&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="comment token"&gt;# timing originally&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"""timing decorator function
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; :print("\n&amp;nbsp; print results inside wrapper or use &amp;lt;return&amp;gt; ... ")
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; """&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;import&lt;/SPAN&gt; time
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;from&lt;/SPAN&gt; functools &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;import&lt;/SPAN&gt; wraps

&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; @wraps&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;func&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;def&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="token function"&gt;wrapper&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;*&lt;/SPAN&gt;args&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;**&lt;/SPAN&gt;kwargs&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;:&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; t0 &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt; time&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;perf_counter&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="comment token"&gt;# start time&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; result &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt; func&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;*&lt;/SPAN&gt;args&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;**&lt;/SPAN&gt;kwargs&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="comment token"&gt;# ... run the function ...&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; t1 &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt; time&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;perf_counter&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="comment token"&gt;# end time&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; dt &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt; t1 &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt; t0
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;print&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"\nTiming function for... {}"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;format&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;func&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;__name__&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;print&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"&amp;nbsp; Time: {: &amp;lt;8.2e}s for {:,} objects"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;format&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;dt&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; len&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;result&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;return&lt;/SPAN&gt; result&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="comment token"&gt;# return the result of the function&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;return&lt;/SPAN&gt; dt&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="comment token"&gt;# return delta time&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;return&lt;/SPAN&gt; wrapper&lt;SPAN class="line-numbers-rows"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206370#M15876</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-11T10:12:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206371#M15877</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, Dan.&amp;nbsp; I won't assume anything with ArcGIS Pro and stand-alone scripts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 16:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206371#M15877</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted-user-ZTub55yWbsya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-01T16:59:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206372#M15878</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I HAVE experienced the same kind of slowness in ArcGIS Pro and in stand-alone python when using TableToTable conversion to export to a DBF. I'm exporting&amp;nbsp;329518 address records. In ArcCatalog and Python 2.7 it takes about 5 seconds. After multiple attempts in ArcGIS Pro and its Python install I gave up after 10 minutes! Something obviously not right there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206372#M15878</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterSchoenfield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-15T21:38:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206373#M15879</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neat... throw the decorator I posted around a def that contains your calls to TableToTable so you can time the same code in 2.7 and 3.5.&amp;nbsp; If would allow you to check whether there is any changes in arcpy between the two implementations.&amp;nbsp; It would be interesting to track these things.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206373#M15879</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-15T21:48:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206374#M15880</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did some additional testing to record the times. Using ArcGIS Desktop python here are the results:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C:\Temp&amp;gt;python TimeTest.py&lt;BR /&gt;07:41:50 AM, Tuesday December 19, 2017&lt;BR /&gt;07:42:22 AM, Tuesday December 19, 2017&lt;BR /&gt;C:\Temp&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then using the ArcGIS Pro python, same script:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C:\Temp&amp;gt;"C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\bin\Python\scripts\propy.bat" TimeTest.py&lt;BR /&gt;09:18:50 AM, Monday December 18, 2017&lt;BR /&gt;05:46:15 AM, Tuesday December 19, 2017&lt;BR /&gt;C:\Temp&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the results speak for themselves. I will be calling tech support about this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:20:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206374#M15880</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterSchoenfield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-19T17:20:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206375#M15881</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bizarre!!! you do certainly have a time problem there.&amp;nbsp; Report back!&amp;nbsp; It would be interesting to find out what caused this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206375#M15881</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-19T18:13:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Python Execute Reviewer Batch Job script is slower in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206376#M15882</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Peter,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I work at Esri and have done some testing with the TableToTable tool - I just tried a dataset with ~70k records, exported to a dbf. This took a little over one second. I believe there might be something specific to your data or the settings you are using with the tool that is causing this problem. Maybe your dataset has a lot of fields? My dataset only had about 20. Would it be possible for you to share the data with me, and the Python command you are running? I can set up a box folder to upload the data, just send me a message at &lt;A href="mailto:dflater@esri.com"&gt;dflater@esri.com&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 23:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-questions/python-execute-reviewer-batch-job-script-is-slower/m-p/206376#M15882</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrewFlater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-20T23:55:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

