<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Expand ToolValidator object class for versatility in parameter access in Python Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-ideas/expand-toolvalidator-object-class-for-versatility/idi-p/1529591</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When creating/altering a custom geoprocessing tool, managing parameters in the &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; object can be unwieldy, especially with constant use of &lt;FONT size="3"&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params[...]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; (or a temporary replacement variable inside an object method) and referring to parameters by their positional index.&amp;nbsp; As validation grows in complexity, simplicity and explicitness can provide greater readability in syntax.&amp;nbsp; This can be accomplished in the default &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; class by adding a simple attribute and making the parameters subscriptable with a &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Through this, parameters can be accessed by Python sequence index/slice (e.g. &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[0]&lt;/FONT&gt;, &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[0:4]&lt;/FONT&gt;, &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[-1]&lt;/FONT&gt;, etc.) or by parameter name as a mapping key (e.g. &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self['input_features']&lt;/FONT&gt;,&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt; self['spatial_ref']&lt;/FONT&gt;, etc.), and these approaches will function just like accessing &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params&lt;/FONT&gt; (e.g. &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params[0].value&lt;/FONT&gt; is the same as&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[0].value&lt;/FONT&gt; and &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self['input_features'].value&lt;/FONT&gt;). Providing this capability allows for more versatility and readability, with simpler syntax via index/slice and explicit, index-independent syntax via key.&amp;nbsp; The latter can be especially useful if tool parameters need to be reordered (since the key-based approach ignores order) or if explicitly identifying the parameter in the code is desired.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, this capability would not affect preexisting approaches to validation logic, as it does not change the accessibility of &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params&lt;/FONT&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The expanded default &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; object class would appear as:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="c"&gt;class ToolValidator:
    
    """class to add custom behavior and properties to the tool and tool
    parameters
    """

    def __init__(self: object):
        # set self.params for use in other function
        self.params = arcpy.GetParameterInfo()
        self.params_map = dict((i.name, i) for i in self.params)
        return

    def initializeParameters(self: object):
        """customizes parameter properties; called when tool is opened"""
        return

    def updateParameters(self: object):
        """modifies parameter values and properties; called whenever a
        parameter is modified, before standard validation
        """
        return

    def updateMessages(self: object):
        """customizes messages for parameters; called after standard
        validation
        """
        return

    def __getitem__(self: object, reference: slice) -&amp;gt; object:
        if isinstance(reference, str): return self.params_map[reference]
        return self.params[reference]&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can personally attest to the effectiveness of these additions, allowing for both simpler syntax and the flexibility to revise my tool parameters without using a position index as an intermediary to identifying parameter references when refactoring.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>StanNielson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-29T17:42:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Expand ToolValidator object class for versatility in parameter access</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-ideas/expand-toolvalidator-object-class-for-versatility/idi-p/1529591</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When creating/altering a custom geoprocessing tool, managing parameters in the &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; object can be unwieldy, especially with constant use of &lt;FONT size="3"&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params[...]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; (or a temporary replacement variable inside an object method) and referring to parameters by their positional index.&amp;nbsp; As validation grows in complexity, simplicity and explicitness can provide greater readability in syntax.&amp;nbsp; This can be accomplished in the default &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; class by adding a simple attribute and making the parameters subscriptable with a &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Through this, parameters can be accessed by Python sequence index/slice (e.g. &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[0]&lt;/FONT&gt;, &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[0:4]&lt;/FONT&gt;, &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[-1]&lt;/FONT&gt;, etc.) or by parameter name as a mapping key (e.g. &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self['input_features']&lt;/FONT&gt;,&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt; self['spatial_ref']&lt;/FONT&gt;, etc.), and these approaches will function just like accessing &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params&lt;/FONT&gt; (e.g. &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params[0].value&lt;/FONT&gt; is the same as&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self[0].value&lt;/FONT&gt; and &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self['input_features'].value&lt;/FONT&gt;). Providing this capability allows for more versatility and readability, with simpler syntax via index/slice and explicit, index-independent syntax via key.&amp;nbsp; The latter can be especially useful if tool parameters need to be reordered (since the key-based approach ignores order) or if explicitly identifying the parameter in the code is desired.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, this capability would not affect preexisting approaches to validation logic, as it does not change the accessibility of &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;self.params&lt;/FONT&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The expanded default &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; object class would appear as:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="c"&gt;class ToolValidator:
    
    """class to add custom behavior and properties to the tool and tool
    parameters
    """

    def __init__(self: object):
        # set self.params for use in other function
        self.params = arcpy.GetParameterInfo()
        self.params_map = dict((i.name, i) for i in self.params)
        return

    def initializeParameters(self: object):
        """customizes parameter properties; called when tool is opened"""
        return

    def updateParameters(self: object):
        """modifies parameter values and properties; called whenever a
        parameter is modified, before standard validation
        """
        return

    def updateMessages(self: object):
        """customizes messages for parameters; called after standard
        validation
        """
        return

    def __getitem__(self: object, reference: slice) -&amp;gt; object:
        if isinstance(reference, str): return self.params_map[reference]
        return self.params[reference]&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can personally attest to the effectiveness of these additions, allowing for both simpler syntax and the flexibility to revise my tool parameters without using a position index as an intermediary to identifying parameter references when refactoring.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-ideas/expand-toolvalidator-object-class-for-versatility/idi-p/1529591</guid>
      <dc:creator>StanNielson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-29T17:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expand ToolValidator object class for versatility in parameter access</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-ideas/expand-toolvalidator-object-class-for-versatility/idc-p/1529598#M353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Related:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/make-python-toolbox-parameters-a-namedtuple/idi-p/1133743" target="_blank"&gt;Make Python Toolbox parameters a namedtuple instea... - Esri Community&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-ideas/expand-toolvalidator-object-class-for-versatility/idc-p/1529598#M353</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlfredBaldenweck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-29T17:50:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expand ToolValidator object class for versatility in parameter access</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-ideas/expand-toolvalidator-object-class-for-versatility/idc-p/1529608#M354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/458875"&gt;@AlfredBaldenweck&lt;/a&gt;: That is definitely a similar idea.&amp;nbsp; However, this retains original functionality while also allowing the user the remove the &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;.params&lt;/FONT&gt; portion by making the object subscriptable.&amp;nbsp; This could go even further by assigning the parameters as attributes to the &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ToolValidator&lt;/FONT&gt; object in its constructor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/python-ideas/expand-toolvalidator-object-class-for-versatility/idc-p/1529608#M354</guid>
      <dc:creator>StanNielson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-29T18:04:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

