<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance drop with increased max coded domain, any alternative approach? in Publishing and Managing Services Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/publishing-and-managing-services-questions/performance-drop-with-increased-max-coded-domain/m-p/1614945#M1387</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a huge map-service which doesn't show coded descriptions because the maxcodedvalue on ArcGIS server was set to 25000, after trial and error we found that possible value is 4Million for the map-service and we also increased the java heap size to 512. This dropped the performance of the map service and made it too slow to load. And atlast we had to revert back to default&amp;nbsp;maxcodedvalue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking for some suggestion and any alternative approach like, creating/calculating a new domain desc field may be(but not sure on the consequences on performance)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 12:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AmoghMahesh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-15T12:30:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance drop with increased max coded domain, any alternative approach?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/publishing-and-managing-services-questions/performance-drop-with-increased-max-coded-domain/m-p/1614945#M1387</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a huge map-service which doesn't show coded descriptions because the maxcodedvalue on ArcGIS server was set to 25000, after trial and error we found that possible value is 4Million for the map-service and we also increased the java heap size to 512. This dropped the performance of the map service and made it too slow to load. And atlast we had to revert back to default&amp;nbsp;maxcodedvalue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking for some suggestion and any alternative approach like, creating/calculating a new domain desc field may be(but not sure on the consequences on performance)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 12:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/publishing-and-managing-services-questions/performance-drop-with-increased-max-coded-domain/m-p/1614945#M1387</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmoghMahesh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-15T12:30:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

