<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why did Esri choose to create zLas, a proprietary format, rather than collaborating with or building on existing open standards like LASzip? in Standards and Interoperability Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/standards-and-interoperability-questions/why-did-esri-choose-to-create-zlas-a-proprietary/m-p/311248#M160</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For background, see Paul Ramsey's article: &lt;A href="http://boundlessgeo.com/2014/01/lidar-format-wars/" title="http://boundlessgeo.com/2014/01/lidar-format-wars/"&gt;Format Wars Episode V: LIDAR - Boundless&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And James Fee: &lt;A href="http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2014/01/15/las-laz-lazzip-zlas-and-you/" title="http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2014/01/15/las-laz-lazzip-zlas-and-you/"&gt;LAS, LAZ, LasZip, zLAS and You&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does this decision square with Esri's "Open" initiative?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:30:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomMacWright1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-16T14:30:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why did Esri choose to create zLas, a proprietary format, rather than collaborating with or building on existing open standards like LASzip?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/standards-and-interoperability-questions/why-did-esri-choose-to-create-zlas-a-proprietary/m-p/311248#M160</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For background, see Paul Ramsey's article: &lt;A href="http://boundlessgeo.com/2014/01/lidar-format-wars/" title="http://boundlessgeo.com/2014/01/lidar-format-wars/"&gt;Format Wars Episode V: LIDAR - Boundless&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And James Fee: &lt;A href="http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2014/01/15/las-laz-lazzip-zlas-and-you/" title="http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2014/01/15/las-laz-lazzip-zlas-and-you/"&gt;LAS, LAZ, LasZip, zLAS and You&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does this decision square with Esri's "Open" initiative?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:30:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/standards-and-interoperability-questions/why-did-esri-choose-to-create-zlas-a-proprietary/m-p/311248#M160</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomMacWright1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-16T14:30:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

