<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Geo - Partial Overlapping Links limitations? in Mapping Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759928#M8162</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I just wanted to follow up with some screenshots and my workflow because your comments helped out and I have it working.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In attachment "4_Cables" I'm highlighting 4 partially overlapping cables.&amp;nbsp; At this point they overlap, but start/end in different locations.&amp;nbsp; They are spatially coincident in this locations because they exist in the same ductbank and the routes are built from the ductbank geometry.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The map units are in feet, and I had to use an incredibly small buffer width and offset.&amp;nbsp; See "overlap settings".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The last image, "After_Running_Pola", shows the same cables with the offset applied.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, it crashes if I run against the entire schematic, but if I select a few features it works perfectly.&amp;nbsp; I wonder about the crash issue now...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NicholasVoss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-24T14:50:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geo - Partial Overlapping Links limitations?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759926#M8160</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm attempting to create a realistic map of a fiber network by utilizing the 'initialize link vertices' From the Schematic Builder Properties.&amp;nbsp; Our fiber cables are derived from our communication maps that include highly detailed paths (I.e. lots of vertices and arcs in short lengths).&amp;nbsp; Many of our links, from manhole to manhole, are less than 200' and are not straight paths.&amp;nbsp; In some locations of our network there are several cables that share partially identical geometries and I want to separate these so I can visualize all of the cables in our network where overlap exists.&amp;nbsp; When I attempt to use the Geo - Partial Overlapping Links tools, no geometries are changed in the schematic and all cables stay overlapped.&amp;nbsp; I've attempted to change the parameters and cannot get any results by making the buffer/offset both larger and smaller.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm starting to wonder if our network is too detailed for the tool.&amp;nbsp; Is anyone aware of limitations to network complexity?&amp;nbsp; Any other ways I might be able to achieve the desired results?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank You!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759926#M8160</guid>
      <dc:creator>NicholasVoss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-24T12:08:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geo - Partial Overlapping Links limitations?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759927#M8161</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No limitation that I can think of.&amp;nbsp; Usually if it doesn't separate anything, means it didn't find a conflict.&amp;nbsp; So that first property setting 'BufferWidth' is very important.&amp;nbsp; That is what it uses to find a conflict and then it uses the next value 'offset' for the new spacing.&amp;nbsp; ***Remember that these settings are interpreted in map units.&amp;nbsp; So if your map units are decimal degrees and your conflict setting is 1...well, it will be a bit strange.&amp;nbsp; So make sure to either have more realistic map units, or to set the property value to something that makes sense based on those units '.00005' for example.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you still can't get it to work, if possible, export your diagram as XML, clean up any critical information as needed, and get it to me so we can take a look.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759927#M8161</guid>
      <dc:creator>RickAnderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-24T13:49:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geo - Partial Overlapping Links limitations?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759928#M8162</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I just wanted to follow up with some screenshots and my workflow because your comments helped out and I have it working.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In attachment "4_Cables" I'm highlighting 4 partially overlapping cables.&amp;nbsp; At this point they overlap, but start/end in different locations.&amp;nbsp; They are spatially coincident in this locations because they exist in the same ductbank and the routes are built from the ductbank geometry.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The map units are in feet, and I had to use an incredibly small buffer width and offset.&amp;nbsp; See "overlap settings".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The last image, "After_Running_Pola", shows the same cables with the offset applied.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, it crashes if I run against the entire schematic, but if I select a few features it works perfectly.&amp;nbsp; I wonder about the crash issue now...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759928#M8162</guid>
      <dc:creator>NicholasVoss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-24T14:50:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geo - Partial Overlapping Links limitations?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759929#M8163</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You must be doing it wrong, our software never crashes &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What version of ArcGIS are you on and what does the 'entire schematic' really mean?&amp;nbsp; How many nodes, links etc...?&amp;nbsp; If the crash is reproducible, can you watch the memory on your machine and see what happens when you run this to see if it is a memory limitation?&amp;nbsp; This algorithm is pretty memory intensive as it has a lot of calculations to figure out especially if you are doing this on a large diagram.&amp;nbsp; How much RAM is on this machine?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/geo-partial-overlapping-links-limitations/m-p/759929#M8163</guid>
      <dc:creator>RickAnderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-28T21:33:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

