<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dasymetric Tool: Dasy Output Excludes Some Blocks in Mapping Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/dasymetric-tool-dasy-output-excludes-some-blocks/m-p/659932#M7167</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After some more in depth review of the "dasy_rast" data I noticed that the BLOCKID10 does not match the US Census BLOCKID10. Maybe it was key area that caused this but only one way to find out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Justin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:11:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JustinEddings</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-27T18:11:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dasymetric Tool: Dasy Output Excludes Some Blocks</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/dasymetric-tool-dasy-output-excludes-some-blocks/m-p/659931#M7166</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been working with the Dasymetric Mapping 2014 tool for ArcGIS 10.2.2. I applied the following to the tool:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-Population: US Census Block 2010, for a region of CT&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-Land Use: NLCD 2011, clipped to CT and Reclassified to 1-High, 2-Medium, 3-Low, 4-Uninhabited&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-Key Field: OBJECTID&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-Population: POP10&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-Uninhabited: 4&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-Coverage: 80% (Default)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A closer look at the "dasy_rast" saw some areas where entire blocks contained 0 NEWPOP/NEWDENSITY cells even with a positive population and inhabited classes. Anyone else run into this problem? Any thoughts as to why this might be happening are appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Justin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/dasymetric-tool-dasy-output-excludes-some-blocks/m-p/659931#M7166</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustinEddings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-27T16:48:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dasymetric Tool: Dasy Output Excludes Some Blocks</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/dasymetric-tool-dasy-output-excludes-some-blocks/m-p/659932#M7167</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After some more in depth review of the "dasy_rast" data I noticed that the BLOCKID10 does not match the US Census BLOCKID10. Maybe it was key area that caused this but only one way to find out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Justin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:11:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/dasymetric-tool-dasy-output-excludes-some-blocks/m-p/659932#M7167</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustinEddings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-27T18:11:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dasymetric Tool: Dasy Output Excludes Some Blocks</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/dasymetric-tool-dasy-output-excludes-some-blocks/m-p/659933#M7168</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the weekend to think it over, I reset my procedure and used an FID rather than the BLOCKID10 field for the key field. The result fills in all the block areas with a population and residential class. I was able to convert the dasy_rast to a point feature class (NEWDENSITY, not NEWPOP) and use a spatial join to sum the regions of CT. At first, 0 value points made up about 75% of the feature class so I ran the conversion again using after selecting only the raster values &amp;gt;0. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 19:14:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/dasymetric-tool-dasy-output-excludes-some-blocks/m-p/659933#M7168</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustinEddings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-02T19:14:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

