<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Representation VS Layer File in Mapping Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/representation-vs-layer-file/m-p/613477#M6677</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;I was playing around with the symbology and labels for our County Roads and wanted to save the display settings as a representation and some weird things started to happen.&amp;nbsp; The first screenshot is the Roads FC before converting to representation. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]17271[/ATTACH]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So Far so good, it gets converted to representation fine.&amp;nbsp; However, when I pull in the Roads FC with the updated representation it looks like this: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]17272[/ATTACH]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I do not know why some of the city roads are showing up as red like the state highways.&amp;nbsp; Some of the roads are state and city highways but the way I have the symbology set up, they are symbolized and labeled by the appropriate fields for the appropriate scales.&amp;nbsp; Also, I saved the Roads FC as a layer file and the layer file looks exactly like the first screenshot with no problems.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know why the representation does not work the same way?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Caleb&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Caleb.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I suggest you check if your city roads have their correct Rule ID Field in the attribute table, because you can have those red lines because of one of two reasons:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a. The feature's RuleID doesn't have a RuleID assigned and it displays as a NoRule Representation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;b. The feature's RuleID it's the same as your highways and it's representation is the same.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Remember that using representations use the RuleID as the field that assign the symbol.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good Luck&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leandro-Zamudio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-28T00:38:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Representation VS Layer File</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/representation-vs-layer-file/m-p/613476#M6676</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I was playing around with the symbology and labels for our County Roads and wanted to save the display settings as a representation and some weird things started to happen.&amp;nbsp; The first screenshot is the Roads FC before converting to representation. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]17271[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So Far so good, it gets converted to representation fine.&amp;nbsp; However, when I pull in the Roads FC with the updated representation it looks like this: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]17272[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I do not know why some of the city roads are showing up as red like the state highways.&amp;nbsp; Some of the roads are state and city highways but the way I have the symbology set up, they are symbolized and labeled by the appropriate fields for the appropriate scales.&amp;nbsp; Also, I saved the Roads FC as a layer file and the layer file looks exactly like the first screenshot with no problems.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know why the representation does not work the same way?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Caleb&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:59:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/representation-vs-layer-file/m-p/613476#M6676</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-27T19:59:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Representation VS Layer File</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/representation-vs-layer-file/m-p/613477#M6677</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;I was playing around with the symbology and labels for our County Roads and wanted to save the display settings as a representation and some weird things started to happen.&amp;nbsp; The first screenshot is the Roads FC before converting to representation. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]17271[/ATTACH]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So Far so good, it gets converted to representation fine.&amp;nbsp; However, when I pull in the Roads FC with the updated representation it looks like this: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]17272[/ATTACH]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I do not know why some of the city roads are showing up as red like the state highways.&amp;nbsp; Some of the roads are state and city highways but the way I have the symbology set up, they are symbolized and labeled by the appropriate fields for the appropriate scales.&amp;nbsp; Also, I saved the Roads FC as a layer file and the layer file looks exactly like the first screenshot with no problems.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know why the representation does not work the same way?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Caleb&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Caleb.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I suggest you check if your city roads have their correct Rule ID Field in the attribute table, because you can have those red lines because of one of two reasons:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a. The feature's RuleID doesn't have a RuleID assigned and it displays as a NoRule Representation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;b. The feature's RuleID it's the same as your highways and it's representation is the same.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Remember that using representations use the RuleID as the field that assign the symbol.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good Luck&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/representation-vs-layer-file/m-p/613477#M6677</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leandro-Zamudio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-28T00:38:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Representation VS Layer File</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/representation-vs-layer-file/m-p/613478#M6678</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: Caleb1987&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Leonardo,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;a. The feature's RuleID doesn't have a RuleID assigned and it displays as a NoRule Representation.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; Your suggestions helped me find the problem.&amp;nbsp; It turns out that everything was fine in the representation file and I had just forgotten that I had all the allies not symbolized in the original file due to a definition query.&amp;nbsp; I guess I should have checked that first!&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Caleb&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/representation-vs-layer-file/m-p/613478#M6678</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-28T12:21:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

