<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Labeling priority in Mapping Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/labeling-priority/m-p/322837#M3397</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Josh,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Label priorities are used when deciding which of two conflicting labels to delete - the label with lower priority will be deleted. Unfortunately, there are many other reasons for a label not to be placed. It may be too large for the feature, there could be conflict with other features, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You could also try Never Remove on the 'Priority 1' label class, although you may get some overlapping labels. They should all be placed, though.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JonMorris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:34:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Labeling priority</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/labeling-priority/m-p/322835#M3395</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have kind of adopted the Local Government Data model and one of the things I am using is FacilitySitePoint for labelling.&amp;nbsp; Using the template General Purpose map it works great at the larger scales but starting at 1:72000 I start having issues with labels not appearing.&amp;nbsp; This of course is due to my maplex settings, so I what I thought I would do is set up a Label Priority field where I could tell the labelling engine which labels should actually be used at the smaller scales.&amp;nbsp; I can't figure out how to do multiple levels though.&amp;nbsp; I can get it to label based on a SQL statement for one but I can't get a second tier figured out.&amp;nbsp; I thought I would mess with the numbering until the right labels appeared at the right times, but I can't figure out an easy way to do this without having to have multiple copies of the layers in the data frame set up differently.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to select which labels are more important than others based on a priority field?&amp;nbsp; I guess what I'm trying to say is that I set up two labelling classes Priority 1 and Priority 2.&amp;nbsp; I told them both to label.&amp;nbsp; Trouble is there is no way to tell the engine that Priority 1 should take precedence over Priority 2.&amp;nbsp; I tried changing the feature weight and that had no affect, I'm assuming because it is the same feature class.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm using the SQL statement to select what is in the class: "LabelPriority" = '1' and "LabelPriority" &amp;lt;&amp;gt; '1'&amp;nbsp; I've also tried to use "LabelPriority" = '2' but that didn't change anything.&amp;nbsp; I have in the feature class a field called LabelPriority where I enter 1 or 2 or leave it null.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In one case I had a feature with 2 and it labelled over another label with priority 1.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:34:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/labeling-priority/m-p/322835#M3395</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshWhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-13T13:34:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Labeling priority</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/labeling-priority/m-p/322836#M3396</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This issue was fixed by using the Local Government Basemap Templates along with Attribute Assistant.&amp;nbsp; Definition queries were used based on the shape area and this has been resolved using that method.&amp;nbsp; Still leaves some to be desired as size doesn't necessarily dictate importance of labelling but in general, it works for my needs.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/labeling-priority/m-p/322836#M3396</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshWhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-26T12:51:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Labeling priority</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/labeling-priority/m-p/322837#M3397</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Josh,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Label priorities are used when deciding which of two conflicting labels to delete - the label with lower priority will be deleted. Unfortunately, there are many other reasons for a label not to be placed. It may be too large for the feature, there could be conflict with other features, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You could also try Never Remove on the 'Priority 1' label class, although you may get some overlapping labels. They should all be placed, though.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/labeling-priority/m-p/322837#M3397</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonMorris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:34:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

