<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is the Earth/Map Projections concept still relevant in Mapping Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/is-the-earth-map-projections-concept-still/m-p/199894#M2137</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, there's no reason why you couldn't always store your data in latitude/longitude/height and only project it either on-the-fly for display or printing or make a copy that's in a projected coordinate reference system for analysis or whatever.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The biggest issue right now is that many algorithms used for analysis either don't have a 3D version implemented (sometimes due to complexity) AND/OR they're slow, often really slow, much slower than the equivalent 2D algorithm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even keeping all data in latitude/longitude/height, there's still a lot of different geographic and vertical coordinate reference systems out there so you would still need to reconcile these to use data layers together.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Melita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MelitaKennedy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-06T15:51:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Earth/Map Projections concept still relevant</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/is-the-earth-map-projections-concept-still/m-p/199893#M2136</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I was explaining to someone the concept of map projections (i.e., the act of projecting the earth sphere on to a flat sphere), I wondered this myself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Considering now that devices are able to capture and represent the 3D shape of the Earth more accurately, how relevant is the map projections relevant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The map projections could be used only when printing maps on to a flat paper.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keen to hear from others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, Thiru&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/is-the-earth-map-projections-concept-still/m-p/199893#M2136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thiru_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-06T07:05:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the Earth/Map Projections concept still relevant</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/is-the-earth-map-projections-concept-still/m-p/199894#M2137</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, there's no reason why you couldn't always store your data in latitude/longitude/height and only project it either on-the-fly for display or printing or make a copy that's in a projected coordinate reference system for analysis or whatever.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The biggest issue right now is that many algorithms used for analysis either don't have a 3D version implemented (sometimes due to complexity) AND/OR they're slow, often really slow, much slower than the equivalent 2D algorithm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even keeping all data in latitude/longitude/height, there's still a lot of different geographic and vertical coordinate reference systems out there so you would still need to reconcile these to use data layers together.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Melita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/is-the-earth-map-projections-concept-still/m-p/199894#M2137</guid>
      <dc:creator>MelitaKennedy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-06T15:51:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the Earth/Map Projections concept still relevant</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/is-the-earth-map-projections-concept-still/m-p/199895#M2138</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Melita for your practical advice.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was thinking about representing the Earth's surface as close to the reality as possible on our screens&amp;nbsp; so when we measure a piece of land on the map, it equates exactly to the real-world measurement on Earth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I remember I came across this proposed Discrete Global Grid System&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://geoawesomeness.com/discrete-global-grid-system-dggs-new-reference-system/" title="http://geoawesomeness.com/discrete-global-grid-system-dggs-new-reference-system/"&gt;http://geoawesomeness.com/discrete-global-grid-system-dggs-new-reference-system/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;which gets implemented, we might do away with all the different map projections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thiru&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 06:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/mapping-questions/is-the-earth-map-projections-concept-still/m-p/199895#M2138</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thiru_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-07T06:21:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

