<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Post-processing question about records in Land Records and Valuation Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/land-records-and-valuation-questions/post-processing-question-about-records/m-p/790439#M149</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The &amp;lt;map&amp;gt; record is usually overlapping much of the data so making a change somewhere in the data that has the &amp;lt;map&amp;gt; record within the extent might cause that feature to be updated which could cause performance slow down.&amp;nbsp; This issue will be addressed with ArcGIS Pro 2.5.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:23:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JasonCamerano</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-30T17:23:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Post-processing question about records</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/land-records-and-valuation-questions/post-processing-question-about-records/m-p/790438#M148</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;During the upgrade of an ArcMap parcel fabric one of the recommended steps in the post-processing stage is to "&lt;STRONG&gt;Delete large records like &amp;lt;Map&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;MAP&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; (on staging file geodatabase)&lt;/STRONG&gt;"&amp;nbsp; What is the rationale for this and what would generally be considered a "large" record?&amp;nbsp; Quarter Section size, Section size, Township size, 9200 square mile size?&lt;/MAP&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Parcel Fabric - Migrating and Administrating Parcels with ArcGIS Pro SLide" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/454790_Records.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:28:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/land-records-and-valuation-questions/post-processing-question-about-records/m-p/790438#M148</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidMinton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-30T16:28:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-processing question about records</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/land-records-and-valuation-questions/post-processing-question-about-records/m-p/790439#M149</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The &amp;lt;map&amp;gt; record is usually overlapping much of the data so making a change somewhere in the data that has the &amp;lt;map&amp;gt; record within the extent might cause that feature to be updated which could cause performance slow down.&amp;nbsp; This issue will be addressed with ArcGIS Pro 2.5.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:23:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/land-records-and-valuation-questions/post-processing-question-about-records/m-p/790439#M149</guid>
      <dc:creator>JasonCamerano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-30T17:23:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

