<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Creating non-overlapping buffer polygons for intersecting rail pollines (switches &amp;amp; diamonds) in Implementing ArcGIS Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/creating-non-overlapping-buffer-polygons-for/m-p/1682395#M801</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Attached is the Coastal Ranges Routes layer I am working with&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 15:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sriramramaswamy12</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-05T15:26:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creating non-overlapping buffer polygons for intersecting rail pollines (switches &amp; diamonds)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/creating-non-overlapping-buffer-polygons-for/m-p/1682355#M800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm working with rail centerline polylines that are dissolved by a route/ownership field (SUB_MLN_LMP). I need to generate ROW (right-of-way) buffer polygons such that:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Buffers do not overlap across different SUB_MLN_LMP values&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Intersections at switches and diamonds are handled correctly (ownership is respected rather than evenly split)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Each resulting polygon belongs to only one route/owner&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Standard approaches (buffer + dissolve, union, Voronoi/Thiessen from vertices or densified points) either produce overlapping buffers or split ownership evenly at intersections, which does not match the operational use case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Conceptually, the desired output assigns ownership through intersections based on dominance/priority of routes rather than pure distance geometry (see attached images: black/blue lines correspond to red/green polygons).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone solved a similar rule-based ROW buffer ownership problem in ArcGIS Pro?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for workflow ideas, tools, or modeling approaches (Spatial Analyst available)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Happy to calrify assumptions around switches, diamonds, or ownership rules if needed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 14:05:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/creating-non-overlapping-buffer-polygons-for/m-p/1682355#M800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sriramramaswamy12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-05T14:05:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating non-overlapping buffer polygons for intersecting rail pollines (switches &amp; diamonds)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/creating-non-overlapping-buffer-polygons-for/m-p/1682395#M801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Attached is the Coastal Ranges Routes layer I am working with&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 15:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/creating-non-overlapping-buffer-polygons-for/m-p/1682395#M801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sriramramaswamy12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-05T15:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

