<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Concurrent Licensing EOL? in Implementing ArcGIS Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076500#M706</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You read this I suppose&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/about-licensing.htm" target="_blank"&gt;ArcGIS Desktop licensing—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and named user is currently one Pro option,&amp;nbsp; I doubt that anyone is going to confirm/deny this here... maybe it might come up in the UC questions for Jack&amp;nbsp; this year &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 21:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-07T21:42:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Concurrent Licensing EOL?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076465#M705</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hope this is the right place for this post. I am wondering if anyone has heard any rumors or has information about ESRI moving away from a concurrent licensing model to strictly a named user licensing model. This has has happened to another company and since it seems to be the way things are going in software, I just dont want to be blindsided in the future.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 20:12:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076465#M705</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gibbs78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-07T20:12:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent Licensing EOL?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076500#M706</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You read this I suppose&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/about-licensing.htm" target="_blank"&gt;ArcGIS Desktop licensing—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and named user is currently one Pro option,&amp;nbsp; I doubt that anyone is going to confirm/deny this here... maybe it might come up in the UC questions for Jack&amp;nbsp; this year &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 21:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076500#M706</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-07T21:42:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent Licensing EOL?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076629#M707</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's difficult to completely go away with Concurrent-Use licensing, especially for customers managing licenses through a network without internet connectivity. Handling perpetual licenses (No Timeout) will be another challenge.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this happens, there will definitely be a viable workaround before the migration happens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No official announcement yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 07:50:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076629#M707</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayantaPoddar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-08T07:50:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent Licensing EOL?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076656#M708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As Dan mentioned, you may want to check out the UC Q&amp;amp;A:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/events/uc/faqs/q-a#id=5197" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/events/uc/faqs/q-a#id=5197&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/events/uc/faqs/q-a#id=5030" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/events/uc/faqs/q-a#id=5030&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 11:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076656#M708</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Thompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-08T11:00:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent Licensing EOL?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076677#M709</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Difficult yes. But it doesnt mean it cant\wont be done. Not sure if you use AutoDesk products but they went this direction starting last year. Still a few years off but with desktop going EOL and a bigger push to Pro and AGOL, you have to start planning ahead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 12:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/concurrent-licensing-eol/m-p/1076677#M709</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gibbs78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-08T12:22:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

