<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation in Implementing ArcGIS Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573189#M547</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The GIS training people did mention it's good to do a "save as" of the MXD instead of a regular save every once in a while if I started to have problems.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did run the "analyze map" tool, I got 91 warnings.&amp;nbsp; They are either for "Layer's data source has a different projection" or "Layer's data source doesn't have a spatial index"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ones that have a different projection, the data frame has this projection: "NAD_1983_StatePlane_North_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Feet" and the layer's data has this: "NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_North_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Ft_US"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are those the type of things that can cause problems?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-22T17:14:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573168#M526</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently have a 5-year old Dell Optiplex 920 with the following specs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel® Core™ i7-4770&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;16GB (4x4GB) 1600MHz DDR3 RAM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GeForce GTX 1050 Ti&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Samsung 850 EVO 512 GB SSD Boot Drive&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1TB 7200 rpm Storage Drive&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's my turn to get a new machine this year and I'm not sure If I need to build a higher-end gaming desktop, or get an actual workstation.&amp;nbsp; I maintain our City's water, sewer, drainage, and zoning maps.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Right now the machine is quite slow using ArcGIS Desktop 10.6.&amp;nbsp; When working in ArcMap, I get lots of freezing up and "Not Responding" messages.&amp;nbsp; I to have several different years on aerial images in my map, as well as layers for water, sewer, drainage,m zoning etc.&amp;nbsp; The aerial images are not stored on a local machine, they are accessed through the NC OneMap server.&amp;nbsp; I'm not 100% sure if the slow downs are caused by our network, or my hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would you recommend as specs for a new machine?&amp;nbsp; I may be forced to go with a Dell machine by our "IT" department, but I may be able to talk my way out of it if there is something better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:39:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573168#M526</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T14:39:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573169#M527</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you checked out &lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/get-started/arcgis-pro-system-requirements.htm" title="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/get-started/arcgis-pro-system-requirements.htm"&gt;ArcGIS Pro 2.2 system requirements—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;, Esri lists both supported and recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573169#M527</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T16:28:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573170#M528</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey Michael,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I always recommend taking a look at the specs from the Esri Partner Network page for Dell.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not advocating you purchase through Esri, but use the Specs as a starting point for discussions with IT:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" href="https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/esri-partner-network/our-partners/hardware-partners/dell-esri" title="https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/esri-partner-network/our-partners/hardware-partners/dell-esri"&gt;Dell&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let us know if you have further specific questions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:55:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573170#M528</guid>
      <dc:creator>JacobBoyle412</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T16:55:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573171#M529</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did see that.&amp;nbsp; My current machine is rated as "recommended" or "optimal" according to their specs, but it is still slow.&amp;nbsp; My municipality is new to GIS, so I don't have anyone to help me determine if my issues are hardware, software, or network related.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573171#M529</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T17:05:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573172#M530</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you describe "slow?"&amp;nbsp; ArcGIS Desktop does lots of things, saying it is "slow" is like telling a doctor you hurt and asking him what is wrong without providing any specific information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:17:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573172#M530</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T17:17:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573173#M531</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wrote a brief description of my issue in the original post, 2nd paragraph.&amp;nbsp; I can try to go into more detail this afternoon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573173#M531</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T17:24:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573174#M532</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't describe what is described in the 2nd paragraph as very specific.&amp;nbsp; For example, " When working in ArcMap, I get lots of freezing up and "Not Responding" messages."&amp;nbsp; What does "when working" mean?&amp;nbsp; Are you running geoprocessing tools?&amp;nbsp; If so, which ones?&amp;nbsp; Are you building maps for either printing or export?&amp;nbsp; If so, how are the map layouts structured in terms of data layers and layout elements?&amp;nbsp; Are you editing data?&amp;nbsp; If so, what data and how?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't mean to sound dismissive, I want to help, but there isn't really anything specific enough here yet for people to comment on if you say your machine already meets Esri requirements and then some.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573174#M532</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T17:30:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573175#M533</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll have to forgive me for my poor description of the problem as I'm still new to ArcGIS.&amp;nbsp; I started out maintaining all our City's utilities in AutoCAD, after redrawing them all from paper maps.&amp;nbsp; Someone in the administration decided they wanted to "use GIS" so they hired a contractor to convert all my AutoCAD data into GIS.&amp;nbsp; The contractor gave me 8 hours of GIS training.&amp;nbsp; I've been working to clean up that data ever since.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My&amp;nbsp;database is one layer, with feature classes for each utility type (water, sewer, etc).&amp;nbsp; I have layers for parcels, city limits, and zoning.&amp;nbsp; Then I have 4 different layers of aerial imagery, (different years) that are accessed through the NC One Map servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm mainly editing the utility data right now.&amp;nbsp; I'll select "edit features" for whatever utility I'm working on that day.&amp;nbsp; I get nothing from our people in the field, so I mainly make edits using the aerial images as a reference, or scanned tiff files I have georeferenced.&amp;nbsp; I'll move a hydrant or manhole, or create new ones using the "create features" tool.&amp;nbsp; Pretty basic stuff.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes just panning the view around, or selecting an object can cause the map to freeze up.&amp;nbsp; The cursor will change to the blue/green circle and spin, or the whole screen will grey out and say "not responding".&amp;nbsp; I have to remember to save my updates constantly ( I know you should do that anyways) because sometimes the program will completely crash.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's worse when I have the aerial imagery on.&amp;nbsp; I often have to switch between images to be able to get the clearest view of the area I'm working on.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes the images switch quickly, sometimes it will hang up for 15-30 seconds. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573175#M533</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T18:00:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573176#M534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that info.&amp;nbsp; We already have the software, but it is nice to see what Dell and ESRI recommend.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the cheapest Precision 7920 (here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/desktops-n-workstations/7920/spd/precision-7920-workstation" title="https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/desktops-n-workstations/7920/spd/precision-7920-workstation"&gt;Precision 7920 Powerful Desktop Tower Workstation | Dell United States&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;) really better than a high end gaming desktop?&amp;nbsp; The $2049 model doesn't even come with a SSD, and has similar processor, ram and graphics memory as my 5 year old PC. Unless there's something that makes a workstation inherently better than a regular desktop PC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573176#M534</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T19:57:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573177#M535</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What version of ArcMap are you running?&amp;nbsp; Also, are the map services public facing, could I access them?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 23:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573177#M535</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T23:04:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573178#M536</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Don't fall for the GPU hype, buy as much CPU as you can afford&lt;/STRONG&gt;. The new i9 processors from Intel look promising. I NEVER go over 20% GPU usage (though I don't do 3D work either), meaning I could have gotten away with the P2000 and gotten either a 1TB NVMe, a faster processor, or 32GB RAM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 2018 workstation is an&amp;nbsp;HP Z4 Workstation with a mid-level Xeon (W-2133 @ 3.6GHZ), 16GB of RAM, a Samsung 512 NVMe drive for the OS and working data, a large spinning disk for data backup, and an NVIDIA Quadro P4000. I think the total cost was around $4K. The fans are silent. If you need to keep costs down go with a gaming GPU, 16GB ram and an i7, i9 or Ryzen instead of a Xeon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My computer flies in ArcMap with data stored locally. In ArcPro, random things are slow and overall it feels like beta software with daily crashes, though I still plod along and am slowly converting my workflow to ArcPro, hoping for better results in the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, looking over your post I would guess that the network is your main issue. You can use CrystalDiskMark to check the speeds of your network drives and compare these with your local drives. Pulling a raster over the network will be a disaster unless you have an amazing IT team that keeps the server in good shape and GB LAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573178#M536</guid>
      <dc:creator>MalcolmMeyer2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T14:17:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573179#M537</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sometimes when I'm running slow I will remove any file from my Table of Contents I'm not using.&amp;nbsp; If that doesn't isolate the issue, I will remove the Aerial imagery.&amp;nbsp; If that doesn't speed things up, I will compress the sde.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I am still not responding I will remove the files I am using, one at a time, from Table of Contents, again trying to isolate if I have a slow connection.&amp;nbsp; If I am still freezing up, I will start a new MXD.&amp;nbsp;My final test is to move (export) all files that I'm working with to my C drive and start another new MXD. This would be the extent of tests I can try that are at my disposal.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm new to ArcGIS Pro, but now I am adding this to the steps to isolate (ArcGIS Pro is 64 bit which can make the difference).&amp;nbsp; I'm interested in your response to Joshua as to the version of ArcMap you are using.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:11:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573179#M537</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_RMellor__GISP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T17:11:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573180#M538</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Desktop 10.6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version 10.6.0.8321&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe you could access them, I don't remember having to use a login/password to access them.&amp;nbsp; The server URL is&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-bare" href="https://services.nconemap.gov/secure/rest/services"&gt;https://services.nconemap.gov/secure/rest/services&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&amp;nbsp; I use the 2007, 2010, 2012 and 2018 imagery.&amp;nbsp; They are all located in the "Imagery" folder&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573180#M538</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T17:19:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573181#M539</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've never tried crystaldiskmark, but I can tell you our network is terrible.&amp;nbsp; Our utility billing and financial software is on our server and it takes forever for that to come up.&amp;nbsp; I can guarantee our network is not GB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The aerials I use are not on our server at all.&amp;nbsp; They're on the NC Onemap server, in Raleigh, I guess.&amp;nbsp; I guess everytime the image refreshes, it's downloading it over the internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We do at least have a 100Mbps internet connection now, it was 25 a year ago&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:33:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573181#M539</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T17:33:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573182#M540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your network is slow, speeding up your workstation may not make a difference - unless you move all your data back and forth between your workstation and your server&amp;nbsp;(sde) for every project.&amp;nbsp; Would you regret the workstation purchase if you were not able to gain any processing speed because your network is slow?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573182#M540</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_RMellor__GISP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T17:43:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573183#M541</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I certainly would regret convincing my department to spend $4000 if there was no improvement in performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573183#M541</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T18:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573184#M542</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As others have already mentioned, this seems to be more an issue with your network and accessing/using data sources than your machine, so buying a new machine will likely not improve the situation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I took a look at those imagery services, they are public facing and accessible.&amp;nbsp; In terms of structure, the imagery services are pretty vanilla, nothing special about them.&amp;nbsp; In terms of performance, well, pretty poor at larger map scales.&amp;nbsp; The services initially load fairly quickly, but when you start zooming in, the response times become 5+ seconds.&amp;nbsp; I had one zoom take 8 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcMap is, unfortunately, very linear/serial in many aspects, including rendering and refreshing data layers.&amp;nbsp; If you have several data sources that each take several seconds to refresh, it can easily cause ArcMap to "hang" for 10+ seconds or even much longer.&amp;nbsp; We have run into similar issues in our organization where users have 50+ data sources from EGDBs, GIS Servers, and other network sources in a data frame and complain about how long it takes to open ArcMap and visualize data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is likely no silver bullet to making your application fast.&amp;nbsp; Troubleshooting network data sources takes time, effort, and in-depth knowledge of how the applications (both server and client) and network operate.&amp;nbsp; It could be that EGDBs and GIS services are slow because the data is slow at the ArcGIS Server tier, but it could also be the data is fine with the servers, and the issue is the connection between the client and the server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While you sort out the root cause of your issues, only keep the data layers you need in the data frame.&amp;nbsp; If layers are loaded in the data frame but visibility is turned off, the client still likes to talk with those servers.&amp;nbsp; Dragging unused slow layers from the active data frame to another data frame cuts out all of that extraneous chatter between the client and server and can help the responsiveness of the application in certain cases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:00:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573184#M542</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T19:00:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573185#M543</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that explanation.&amp;nbsp; I had assumed that layers that were in the table of contents, but were turned off, didn't take up any resources.&amp;nbsp; That's good to know.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pardon my ignorance, but how do I move layers from the active data frame to another?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573185#M543</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T19:31:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573186#M544</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Insert a new data frame from one of the application menus, and then just drag the layer from one data frame to the new one that isn't active.&amp;nbsp; Creating a new one may make it active, I can't recall, so you may need to right click and use the context menu on the old data frame to re-activate it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:14:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573186#M544</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T20:14:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended specs for new GIS workstation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573187#M545</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Similar to the comments already provided, sometimes an MXD becomes corrupted. WHen encountering issues, sometimes I'll open a blank MXD and copy the layers of interest to it so that I only have what I need to do a process. Also, ensure that things like all your layers are all using the same map projection; if you're not, transformaitons on the fly are occurring and can significantly impact your work. Try running analyze map to see if there are any efficiencies that can be gained through indexing data, etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:16:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/implementing-arcgis-questions/recommended-specs-for-new-gis-workstation/m-p/573187#M545</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricCollinsOVV</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-22T14:16:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

