<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArcGIS Server installed on desktop outperforms VM by double! in High Availability and Disaster Recovery Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-questions/arcgis-server-installed-on-desktop-outperforms-vm/m-p/854733#M290</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I installed ArcGIS Server on Windows 10 desktop (i7-6700 Quad Core), nothing fancy.&amp;nbsp; I decided to try creating cache on it and I was astonished to see that I can use up to 8-10 SOCs to get close to 100% cpu usage.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;In a VMware environment here at work, I can only run 4 SOCs on a 4 core VM when caching.&amp;nbsp; I also just recently tried deploying ArcGIS Server to&amp;nbsp; Azure in the cloud and yielded the same results.&amp;nbsp; Basically for each SOC it takes 25% cpu in a VM environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So why can I simple desktop outperform VM by double?!?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For those of you wondering about disk IO.&amp;nbsp; My desktop has an SSD&amp;nbsp;but also tried it on the crappy 7200 RPM drive and had the same results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also disabled any anti-virus applications, no difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To keep things fair I also used a local File Geodatabase.&amp;nbsp; However, I experimented with and external SQL Server Box and it had little impact on performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Al&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>County_of_SimcoeGIS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-17T18:24:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Server installed on desktop outperforms VM by double!</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-questions/arcgis-server-installed-on-desktop-outperforms-vm/m-p/854733#M290</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I installed ArcGIS Server on Windows 10 desktop (i7-6700 Quad Core), nothing fancy.&amp;nbsp; I decided to try creating cache on it and I was astonished to see that I can use up to 8-10 SOCs to get close to 100% cpu usage.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;In a VMware environment here at work, I can only run 4 SOCs on a 4 core VM when caching.&amp;nbsp; I also just recently tried deploying ArcGIS Server to&amp;nbsp; Azure in the cloud and yielded the same results.&amp;nbsp; Basically for each SOC it takes 25% cpu in a VM environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So why can I simple desktop outperform VM by double?!?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For those of you wondering about disk IO.&amp;nbsp; My desktop has an SSD&amp;nbsp;but also tried it on the crappy 7200 RPM drive and had the same results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also disabled any anti-virus applications, no difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To keep things fair I also used a local File Geodatabase.&amp;nbsp; However, I experimented with and external SQL Server Box and it had little impact on performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Al&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-questions/arcgis-server-installed-on-desktop-outperforms-vm/m-p/854733#M290</guid>
      <dc:creator>County_of_SimcoeGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-17T18:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

