<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lining up County Coordinate Systems in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/lining-up-county-coordinate-systems/m-p/238999#M8146</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have parcel data for three Minnesota counties, Kittson, Roseau, and Marshall, and they all have a different coordinate system.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kittson and Roseau are in their own specific county coordinate system, and Marshall is in UTM 15N.&amp;nbsp; None of them line up, this is expected though.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Where I am now lost is the projection transformation to line up Kittson and Roseau since they both appear to have their own specific PCS, GCS, and datum information.&amp;nbsp; The corner that should line up nicely between these two is overlapping by approximately 40ft in the SW-NE direction, but the offset lessens or is coincident at some parts of the boundary.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It would sure be nice to get these into something like MN state plane north, or something slightly more common/usable.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The .prj file for all three of these counties came with the data I received from the counties.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 01:58:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KyleWikstrom</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-09T01:58:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lining up County Coordinate Systems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/lining-up-county-coordinate-systems/m-p/238999#M8146</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have parcel data for three Minnesota counties, Kittson, Roseau, and Marshall, and they all have a different coordinate system.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kittson and Roseau are in their own specific county coordinate system, and Marshall is in UTM 15N.&amp;nbsp; None of them line up, this is expected though.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Where I am now lost is the projection transformation to line up Kittson and Roseau since they both appear to have their own specific PCS, GCS, and datum information.&amp;nbsp; The corner that should line up nicely between these two is overlapping by approximately 40ft in the SW-NE direction, but the offset lessens or is coincident at some parts of the boundary.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It would sure be nice to get these into something like MN state plane north, or something slightly more common/usable.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The .prj file for all three of these counties came with the data I received from the counties.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 01:58:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/lining-up-county-coordinate-systems/m-p/238999#M8146</guid>
      <dc:creator>KyleWikstrom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-09T01:58:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

