<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Choosing a Coordinate System in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/choosing-a-coordinate-system/m-p/183034#M6170</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings, I am a forester trying to answer a cartography question&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A client has asked for a file of their management overlaid with latitude bands in 0.1 degree increments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Their management area is best represented in UTM Zone 11N and what I typically deliver their products in, and I had a colleague generate bands of latitude for me, but they came in WGS 1984. If I project the WGS84 file to Zone 11N then I have a lot of distortion at the midpoints of the latitude bands (this was expected), so I would like to minimize the distortion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a "best option" or a middle ground that I could project these files to that would minimize the latitude distortions and still give me the area calculations I would expect from Zone 11N, or keep them close?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and best regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 10:10:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanJensen1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-08T10:10:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Choosing a Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/choosing-a-coordinate-system/m-p/183034#M6170</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings, I am a forester trying to answer a cartography question&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A client has asked for a file of their management overlaid with latitude bands in 0.1 degree increments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Their management area is best represented in UTM Zone 11N and what I typically deliver their products in, and I had a colleague generate bands of latitude for me, but they came in WGS 1984. If I project the WGS84 file to Zone 11N then I have a lot of distortion at the midpoints of the latitude bands (this was expected), so I would like to minimize the distortion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a "best option" or a middle ground that I could project these files to that would minimize the latitude distortions and still give me the area calculations I would expect from Zone 11N, or keep them close?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and best regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 10:10:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/choosing-a-coordinate-system/m-p/183034#M6170</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanJensen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-08T10:10:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Choosing a Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/choosing-a-coordinate-system/m-p/183035#M6171</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the latitude bands look strange, they may not have enough points to be well represented, you might want to consider using&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/data-management/geodetic-densify.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/data-management/geodetic-densify.htm"&gt;Geodetic Densify—Data Management toolbox | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to help maintain their shape when being projected&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 11:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/choosing-a-coordinate-system/m-p/183035#M6171</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-08T11:52:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Choosing a Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/choosing-a-coordinate-system/m-p/183036#M6172</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The latitude 'distortions' are really just a product of overlaying a geographic coordinate system grid onto a projected coordinate system.&amp;nbsp; Any attempt to 'straighten out' the latitude bands will distort the data accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd be tempted to educate the customer, and perhaps use an MGRS grid system instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 11:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/choosing-a-coordinate-system/m-p/183036#M6172</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidPike</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-08T11:54:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

