<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Geometric Network - Primary/Secondary Conductors in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/geometric-network-primary-secondary-conductors/m-p/147051#M4976</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am working on a GN and have successfully completed it.&amp;nbsp; My issue arises with the data edits I had to do for this to work properly.&amp;nbsp; In the particular GN I am working on there are Primary conductors and Secondary conductors running on the same poles, sharing the same junctions.&amp;nbsp; To remedy this I had to separate them as if they were running on two different parallel sets of poles.&amp;nbsp; While this works, I was wondering if there is a way that they can share the same junctions (the poles are not actually in the GN) but I will not get 'LOOPS' and contradicting FLOW.&amp;nbsp; I know that in a GM features can not share the same x, y; so I was thinking maybe I could set the Secondary lines with some sort of z-value.&amp;nbsp; I also have the connectivity set so that Primary lines CAN NOT connect to secondary lines unless there is a Transformer. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it work if I DID put Poles in the GN so the Primary and Secondary lines can snap to these poles, but a Primary Line CAN NOT snap to a Secondary line with Poles, just Transformers and Junctions, of which there wont be any where poles are?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, we have sever al Meter boxes that contain multiple meters...&amp;nbsp; Any suggestions on how to incorporate these without having to manually string them together with service leads...?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>T_Long</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-13T18:29:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geometric Network - Primary/Secondary Conductors</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/geometric-network-primary-secondary-conductors/m-p/147051#M4976</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am working on a GN and have successfully completed it.&amp;nbsp; My issue arises with the data edits I had to do for this to work properly.&amp;nbsp; In the particular GN I am working on there are Primary conductors and Secondary conductors running on the same poles, sharing the same junctions.&amp;nbsp; To remedy this I had to separate them as if they were running on two different parallel sets of poles.&amp;nbsp; While this works, I was wondering if there is a way that they can share the same junctions (the poles are not actually in the GN) but I will not get 'LOOPS' and contradicting FLOW.&amp;nbsp; I know that in a GM features can not share the same x, y; so I was thinking maybe I could set the Secondary lines with some sort of z-value.&amp;nbsp; I also have the connectivity set so that Primary lines CAN NOT connect to secondary lines unless there is a Transformer. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it work if I DID put Poles in the GN so the Primary and Secondary lines can snap to these poles, but a Primary Line CAN NOT snap to a Secondary line with Poles, just Transformers and Junctions, of which there wont be any where poles are?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, we have sever al Meter boxes that contain multiple meters...&amp;nbsp; Any suggestions on how to incorporate these without having to manually string them together with service leads...?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/geometric-network-primary-secondary-conductors/m-p/147051#M4976</guid>
      <dc:creator>T_Long</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-13T18:29:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

