<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: another elevation question in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/another-elevation-question/m-p/137653#M4686</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Saul...you are most helpful as I try to navigate this software (and the forums!!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:14:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MikeHenson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-28T19:14:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>another elevation question</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/another-elevation-question/m-p/137652#M4685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a data file, with "projectedz" field, which is supposed to be ground elevation. THis elevation is recorded in meters, but I need feet. If I convert this elevation to feet, but multiplying the z by 3.28084, I get an elevation that should be similar to what my usgs quad map shows.&amp;nbsp; I am consistently off 80-90 feet from my calculated elevation, to the quad elevation. IE....if I see a point on a quad marked 400', my calculated point is 320. Is my conversion correct? Shouldn't I simply do the multiplication like i mentioned to get feet?&amp;nbsp; Just looking for confirmation that what I am doing is correct.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:54:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/another-elevation-question/m-p/137652#M4685</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeHenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-28T14:54:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: another elevation question</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/another-elevation-question/m-p/137653#M4686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Saul...you are most helpful as I try to navigate this software (and the forums!!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:14:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/another-elevation-question/m-p/137653#M4686</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeHenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-28T19:14:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: another elevation question</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/another-elevation-question/m-p/137654#M4687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there was no conversion on the elevations when joining them to the gdb.&amp;nbsp; Whats odd, that I am figuring out is that the error is 80' all over the map. The discrepancy between the field mapped data and the usgs topo spot elevations from a 7.5 min quad map.&amp;nbsp; I am taking the elevations (dtm) and multiplying by 3.28 to come up with a us foot elevation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:41:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/another-elevation-question/m-p/137654#M4687</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeHenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-28T19:41:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

