<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Append Data in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/append-data/m-p/1635264#M27609</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If the target feature class does indeed have 'identical field structures', couldn't you just use the '&lt;SPAN&gt;Input fields must match target fields' field matching type?&amp;nbsp; If so, it shouldn't matter if field mapping is lost during iteration as it isn't' used.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;R_&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RhettZufelt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-23T00:59:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Append Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/append-data/m-p/1634841#M27607</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In ArcGIS Pro 3.1.5, I am using Model Builder to iterate feature classes from a source GDB database containing data. The iterated features are then appended to a target empty GDB database with identical field structures. I configured the ​&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;​field matching type​&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;​ to&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;'Reconcile field differences using field mapping'&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;to align corresponding fields. However, during model execution, the field mapping only applies the schema from the ​&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;​first iterated feature class​&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;​, failing to dynamically adjust field mappings for subsequent feature classes. This results in mismatches for datasets with differing field orders or missing fields.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 02:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/append-data/m-p/1634841#M27607</guid>
      <dc:creator>zetaobai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T02:49:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Append Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/append-data/m-p/1634866#M27608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wonder if modelbuilder has the same requirements on how to use fieldmapping as does its implementation notes for python&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/append.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Append (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;note the bullet points regarding when fieldmapping needs to occur&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/append-data/m-p/1634866#M27608</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T08:07:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Append Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/append-data/m-p/1635264#M27609</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the target feature class does indeed have 'identical field structures', couldn't you just use the '&lt;SPAN&gt;Input fields must match target fields' field matching type?&amp;nbsp; If so, it shouldn't matter if field mapping is lost during iteration as it isn't' used.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;R_&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/append-data/m-p/1635264#M27609</guid>
      <dc:creator>RhettZufelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-23T00:59:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

