<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best performance for large buffered areas in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/best-performance-for-large-buffered-areas/m-p/1177797#M26343</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a very large coastline dataset that I need to buffer and I was wondering what the best option for the best perfomance would be. This is for both an feature class in an enterprise geodatabase and a hosted feature layer. I was thinking specifically about the number of vertices that need to be drawn that would affect the performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The options I have are as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option A - Non-overlapping (rings) - Outside Polygons Only&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option B - Non-overlapping (rings)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option C -&amp;nbsp;Overlapping (discs) - Outside Polygons Only&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option D - Overlapping (discs)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/42263i74A8D2D5C2567273/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png" alt="julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 23:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>julian_svcs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-26T23:41:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best performance for large buffered areas</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/best-performance-for-large-buffered-areas/m-p/1177797#M26343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a very large coastline dataset that I need to buffer and I was wondering what the best option for the best perfomance would be. This is for both an feature class in an enterprise geodatabase and a hosted feature layer. I was thinking specifically about the number of vertices that need to be drawn that would affect the performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The options I have are as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option A - Non-overlapping (rings) - Outside Polygons Only&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option B - Non-overlapping (rings)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option C -&amp;nbsp;Overlapping (discs) - Outside Polygons Only&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Option D - Overlapping (discs)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/42263i74A8D2D5C2567273/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png" alt="julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;julian_svcs_0-1653608352099.png&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 23:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/best-performance-for-large-buffered-areas/m-p/1177797#M26343</guid>
      <dc:creator>julian_svcs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-26T23:41:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

