<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Join Lines in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/1156264#M26239</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Now that I have Pro 2.8, it comes with the Summarize tools. Summarize Incident Counts has solved this issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BarryFosberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-22T17:39:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Join Lines</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/367365#M12628</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two sets of polylines or the same data as polygons, some long and a few shorts, I want a single output that combines&amp;nbsp; the shorts to the longs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shorts can only be combined once, Longs may have many shorts connected to them&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0px; min-height: 8pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To re-ask the question I have two polyline files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One is &amp;nbsp;84,171 records the other is 4,944 records. All&amp;nbsp;are street segments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I am done I want a single feature class of the same 84,171 records, but with the 4,944 records added to a connecting, or a bisecting record. I believe that all 4,944 records either touch or cross or are within 2 feet&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;one&amp;nbsp;in the larger feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0px; min-height: 8pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting with polylines,&amp;nbsp; but if the solution is to buffer the lines and combine polygons, that will not hurt the larger project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that snapping will work, but, in moving the lines &amp;nbsp;the snapped lines become severely inaccurate. For example, streets no longer cross at 90 degrees and slant in ways that cause more confusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some background. I started with a single polyline feature of street segments. Segments were from 0.003 feet to several thousand of feet in length.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The goal is to join activity along street lengths to the street and compare activity counts. It is meaningless to compare activity along street lengths that vary that much. I considered normalizing the data.&amp;nbsp;One count on a 0.003 foot length becomes 33333 or so per 100 feet.&amp;nbsp;A confusing thought to begin with and impossible to symbolize in a way that&amp;nbsp;is both visible and meaningful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using a fairly involved process I joined all lengths into in single lengths based on street names. I then split them into 500 foot segments. There is a 1 in 500 change that any given street is exactly divisible by 500. my new single feature had lengths from 0.003 feet to no more than 500 feet. . I chose to divide that feature into two features. 84,171 I now call standard streets, 100-500 feet in length and the rest; 4,944 less than 100 feet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now want to re join the short lengths&amp;nbsp;to a nearest standard length and have&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;almost all of the city streets accounted for and in a narrow range of lengths such that activity can be compared. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:04:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/367365#M12628</guid>
      <dc:creator>BarryFosberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-27T14:04:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Join Lines</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/1000997#M24866</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/336448"&gt;@BarryFosberg&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;do you have access to other software e.g. FME?&amp;nbsp; This could easily be done there using a few transformers such as SpatialRelator and Aggregator.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:30:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/1000997#M24866</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-13T02:30:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Join Lines</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/1001783#M24879</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the suggestion. I had not heard of this software, nor do I have access to other add ins. I will be forwarding your comment to the decision makers in our GIS section.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/1001783#M24879</guid>
      <dc:creator>BarryFosberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-16T16:24:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Join Lines</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/1156264#M26239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Now that I have Pro 2.8, it comes with the Summarize tools. Summarize Incident Counts has solved this issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/join-lines/m-p/1156264#M26239</guid>
      <dc:creator>BarryFosberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-22T17:39:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

