<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Check Geometry tool on a Versioned Feature Class in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1128289#M26076</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ran into this same issues today; went to check geometry on all of our organizations SDE feature classes via python script and received the same error.&amp;nbsp; From what I'm seeing there is no way to directly run check geometry unless you unversion each feature class (which is cumbersome) or if you have a backup, say with a replica, run the tool against that.&amp;nbsp; I plan on going the latter route as we keep daily replicas of the entire database.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brownschuh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-22T13:04:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Check Geometry tool on a Versioned Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1095426#M25801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why is it not possible to use the &lt;STRONG&gt;Check Geometry&lt;/STRONG&gt; geoprocessing tool on a Versioned Feature Class?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;ERROR 001259: Operation not supported on a versioned table.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect I have invalid geometry in my Versioned Feature Class.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to check geometry besides exporting the data or unversioning the table?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have a separate geoprocessing script which reads from this Versioned Feature Class which contains invalid geometry then my script will fail.&amp;nbsp; Does that mean I should not write geoprocessing scripts against Versioned Feature classes because they may contain invalid geometry and my script could fail?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 19:39:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1095426#M25801</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimJohnston3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-03T19:39:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Check Geometry tool on a Versioned Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1095437#M25802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/50322"&gt;@TimJohnston3&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, just out of interest. Can the Repair Geometry tool run on a versioned FC? If so, maybe you just repair straight off the bat. Then have the option to reject the reparations if you didnt want them repairing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:01:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1095437#M25802</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Brooks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-03T20:01:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Check Geometry tool on a Versioned Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1128289#M26076</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ran into this same issues today; went to check geometry on all of our organizations SDE feature classes via python script and received the same error.&amp;nbsp; From what I'm seeing there is no way to directly run check geometry unless you unversion each feature class (which is cumbersome) or if you have a backup, say with a replica, run the tool against that.&amp;nbsp; I plan on going the latter route as we keep daily replicas of the entire database.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1128289#M26076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brownschuh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T13:04:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Check Geometry tool on a Versioned Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1133204#M26104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you add this to Ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 01:01:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1133204#M26104</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanMallett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-13T01:01:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Check Geometry tool on a Versioned Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1133216#M26105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/551356"&gt;@Thomas_Bennett&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;created an Idea already -&amp;gt; go give it Kudo's!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="Kudo it here" href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/check-repair-geometry-tool-should-be-able-to-run/idi-p/1133213/jump-to/first-unread-message" target="_self"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/check-repair-geometry-tool-should-be-able-to-run/idi-p/1133213/jump-to/first-unread-message&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 01:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1133216#M26105</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanMallett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-13T01:35:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Check Geometry tool on a Versioned Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1583632#M27513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Because 3D digital twin is more important.&amp;nbsp; This is a crucial functionality gap. Versioning in general, is really woolly, and needs some serious improvement. (Ability to compare child to child, pick edits to approve/reject/modify; manually or in batch by sql/spatial query, like Conflict Pane but scaled up; the list goes on.)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/check-geometry-tool-on-a-versioned-feature-class/m-p/1583632#M27513</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin_MacLeod</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-10T15:50:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

