<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Count Overlapping Tool over counting polygons? in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/count-overlapping-tool-over-counting-polygons/m-p/1119571#M26002</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to make heat maps of where values are concentrated in space from a combination of survey and interview data we conducted of community members using the Count Overlapping Tool. A colleague of mine made some heat maps without additional categories we later identified in the survey data, and they look like this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_2-1637683407141.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28091i6B90FC6142A96ACE/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_2-1637683407141.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_2-1637683407141.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Furthermore having lived in the area, we both concluded that this map accurately reflect the places)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then re-made the heatmaps to include these updated categories with the Count Overlapping Tool. However the output is showing areas that don't reflect the survey/interview data with approximately ~70 polygons overlapping one another (I have circled them in the screenshot below).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_0-1637683265924.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28089i23C2AE34F48AE475/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_0-1637683265924.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_0-1637683265924.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_3-1637683658925.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28092i2E5CFFCC541E572F/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_3-1637683658925.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_3-1637683658925.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When making the fill transparent these definitely don't look like ~70 polygons overlapping in space&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_1-1637683372878.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28090iED4DE7C2073388C2/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_1-1637683372878.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_1-1637683372878.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why these areas are also raising concerns are these areas are very hard to access/not really a place where people go.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The center where so many polygons are concentrated/overlapping that you can really only see lines are showing about 139 polygons overlapping (which makes sense).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_4-1637683862618.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28093i9F1B3B6D58E5F0B4/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_4-1637683862618.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_4-1637683862618.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am wondering if there is another processing step required to ensure polygons aren't double counted? I have tried also running the Multipart to Singlepart followed by a Spatial Join and getting the same output.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 16:13:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WillemVan_Riet1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-23T16:13:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Count Overlapping Tool over counting polygons?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/count-overlapping-tool-over-counting-polygons/m-p/1119571#M26002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to make heat maps of where values are concentrated in space from a combination of survey and interview data we conducted of community members using the Count Overlapping Tool. A colleague of mine made some heat maps without additional categories we later identified in the survey data, and they look like this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_2-1637683407141.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28091i6B90FC6142A96ACE/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_2-1637683407141.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_2-1637683407141.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Furthermore having lived in the area, we both concluded that this map accurately reflect the places)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then re-made the heatmaps to include these updated categories with the Count Overlapping Tool. However the output is showing areas that don't reflect the survey/interview data with approximately ~70 polygons overlapping one another (I have circled them in the screenshot below).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_0-1637683265924.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28089i23C2AE34F48AE475/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_0-1637683265924.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_0-1637683265924.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_3-1637683658925.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28092i2E5CFFCC541E572F/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_3-1637683658925.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_3-1637683658925.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When making the fill transparent these definitely don't look like ~70 polygons overlapping in space&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_1-1637683372878.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28090iED4DE7C2073388C2/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_1-1637683372878.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_1-1637683372878.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why these areas are also raising concerns are these areas are very hard to access/not really a place where people go.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The center where so many polygons are concentrated/overlapping that you can really only see lines are showing about 139 polygons overlapping (which makes sense).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="WillemVan_Riet1_4-1637683862618.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28093i9F1B3B6D58E5F0B4/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="WillemVan_Riet1_4-1637683862618.png" alt="WillemVan_Riet1_4-1637683862618.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am wondering if there is another processing step required to ensure polygons aren't double counted? I have tried also running the Multipart to Singlepart followed by a Spatial Join and getting the same output.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 16:13:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/count-overlapping-tool-over-counting-polygons/m-p/1119571#M26002</guid>
      <dc:creator>WillemVan_Riet1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-23T16:13:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Count Overlapping Tool over counting polygons?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/count-overlapping-tool-over-counting-polygons/m-p/1123764#M26037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Without access to the data we can only speculate. My first thoughts is that you have multi-part&amp;nbsp; geometries which you need to explode into single parts. If your underlying data is is in WGS84 you might be having issues with the precision of the data and your chosen spatial join search distance?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 12:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/count-overlapping-tool-over-counting-polygons/m-p/1123764#M26037</guid>
      <dc:creator>DuncanHornby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-08T12:36:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

