<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic All of the above. in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/gp-blog/m-p/749098#M24565</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How to use, which it sounds like they are just there, they just work.&amp;nbsp; I like that we don't have to deal with those strings anymore, thats nice.&amp;nbsp; Very simplistic now on our end, much much easier to read. Maybe a writeup on all the classes, strengths on using the classes with arcpy compared to arcgisscripting, a listing of all the classes, perhaps, could be a series of blog posts.&amp;nbsp; There is a lot there.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-29T21:01:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GP Blog</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/gp-blog/m-p/749096#M24563</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If/When you get the chance, I would vote for a post about the new classes that arcpy supports.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:40:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/gp-blog/m-p/749096#M24563</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-29T20:40:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>blog ideas</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/gp-blog/m-p/749097#M24564</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Ted,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sounds like a good idea to me.&amp;nbsp; What sort of information would you like to see?&amp;nbsp; How to use them?&amp;nbsp; What they are?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-Dave&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/gp-blog/m-p/749097#M24564</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidWynne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-29T20:53:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All of the above.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/gp-blog/m-p/749098#M24565</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How to use, which it sounds like they are just there, they just work.&amp;nbsp; I like that we don't have to deal with those strings anymore, thats nice.&amp;nbsp; Very simplistic now on our end, much much easier to read. Maybe a writeup on all the classes, strengths on using the classes with arcpy compared to arcgisscripting, a listing of all the classes, perhaps, could be a series of blog posts.&amp;nbsp; There is a lot there.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/gp-blog/m-p/749098#M24565</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-29T21:01:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

