<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Residual-kriging in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662891#M22091</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes, the model you just described is Universal kriging with first-order trend removal, as implemented in ArcGIS (other implementations allow covariates other than just the x,y coordinates).&amp;nbsp; In the Kriging tool in Spatial Analyst, a global first- or second-order trend is fit to the x,y coordinates.&amp;nbsp; In Geostatistical Analyst, you can do local trend removal (ie, the coefficients of the x,y coordinates in the model will change across the surface).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T19:18:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Residual-kriging</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662890#M22090</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I want to do a resudal-kriging over an area in Arcgis between point values (measured precipitation at different points). It want to do that by first customize a plan of the precipitation by for example making regression on the following equation: p = a*x + b*y + c (where p is the precipitation and x and y are the coordinates) and then kriging the residuals.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is the method I describe the same as "Universal Kriging" in ArcMap, with first order of trend removal?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kindly regards &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Peter&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662890#M22090</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterPai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-08T08:21:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Residual-kriging</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662891#M22091</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes, the model you just described is Universal kriging with first-order trend removal, as implemented in ArcGIS (other implementations allow covariates other than just the x,y coordinates).&amp;nbsp; In the Kriging tool in Spatial Analyst, a global first- or second-order trend is fit to the x,y coordinates.&amp;nbsp; In Geostatistical Analyst, you can do local trend removal (ie, the coefficients of the x,y coordinates in the model will change across the surface).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662891#M22091</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-08T19:18:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Residual-kriging</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662892#M22092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the difference between constant trend removal, and first order of trend removal?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662892#M22092</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterPai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-12T07:46:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Residual-kriging</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662893#M22093</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Constant trend removal either adds or subtracts a constant value to the whole surface (if it is done globally).&amp;nbsp; This value is the same everywhere in the surface.&amp;nbsp; A first-order trend removal will use the X,Y coordinates as predictors in a first-order linear model.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Models:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Constant: z = Intercept + Error&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;First-order: z = Intercept + aX + bY + Error&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;...where z is the variable you are interpolating, and a,b are coefficients that are calculated using ordinary least-squares.&amp;nbsp; Kriging is then performed on the Error term.&amp;nbsp; When the trend removal is done globally (as in the Kriging tool in Spatial Analyst), the values of [Intercept, a, b] will be the same across the entire surface.&amp;nbsp; When you do a local trend removal (only in Geostatistical Analyst), the values of [Intercept, a, b] will be calculated locally using weighted least-squares, so the coefficients will change across the surface.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/residual-kriging/m-p/662893#M22093</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-16T16:10:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

